Who do Neutrals want to win?

[Zinzan]

Who do Neutrals want to win?

 

[Hurricane]

FFS Pews you are not a neutral!

 

[Flem274*]

the body count

failing that, australia are our brothers

 

[Hurricane]

the body count

failing that, australia are our brothers

Hand in your citizenship

 

[Flem274*]

Hand in your citizenship

says he who is supporting ****ing england

 

[Daemon]

I want events to transpire such that there is maximum wahhh accumulated from both sides. That will give me immense satisfaction.

Good cricket is secondary.

 

[Flem274*]

the five all draw suggested in the poll would be amazing tbf considering both teams would have to win every test

 

[Athlai]

I'm starting to like a few of the new English players so on the basis of who I like more I'm Rooting for them. Buuuuut Australia winning and then us beating Australia is better for NZ and the current teams legacy.

 

[Hurricane]

I'm starting to like a few of the new English players so on the basis of who I like more I'm Rooting for them. Buuuuut Australia winning and then us beating Australia is better for NZ and the current teams legacy.

Love your sig. If James made a WW t-shirt I would fork out up to $60 for it.

 

[cnerd123]

This is tricky.

Historically, I would back England, because Australia were the all-mighty, dominant side filled with ****y ****s.

However, recently England have had their share of success and ****s, while Australia have become more human and more likeable.

It's about 50-50 at this stage with regards to who I'd like to see win. I'd like to see certain players do well - Root, Moeen, Butler, Woakes (if he plays), Lyth, Lyon, Clarke, Harris, Rogers - and I'd like to see certain players not do well - basically just Broad and Watson.

Tough call. Gonna go for 'maximum wahhh accumulated from both sides' as my answer too

 

[Howe_zat]

If Australia lose the Ashes they will go back to being 'a team in transition'; which generally means tossing out perfectly good players because they happen to be over 32 - not going to be around for the next Ashes, y'see - for someone who hit a nice cover drive this week.

So NZers should be supporting England if they want to beat Australia themselves this year.

 

[smash84]

supporting England. Don't want Aus to be returning to their winning ways of 1999-2007. Kills competition

 

[harsh.ag]

Definitely would like England to lose because England should lose everything. But would be funny as **** if Australia lost. Can't decide, so went for the last option.

 

[Shri]

****s peeing on cricket pitches should get their asses whooped literally but would settle for a figurative ass kicking.

 

[fredfertang]

How can you have neutrals for the Ashes - ffs people Australia are in it

 

[weldone]

This is tricky.

Historically, I would back England, because Australia were the all-mighty, dominant side filled with ****y ****s.

However, recently England have had their share of success and ****s, while Australia have become more human and more likeable.

It's about 50-50 at this stage with regards to who I'd like to see win. I'd like to see certain players do well - Root, Moeen, Butler, Woakes (if he plays), Lyth, Lyon, Clarke, Harris, Rogers - and I'd like to see certain players not do well - basically just Broad and Watson.

Tough call. Gonna go for 'maximum wahhh accumulated from both sides' as my answer too

Similar, but I'd really support Australia this time because I hate Cook and love/like Pietersen.

 

[Antihippy]

How can you have neutrals for the Ashes - ffs people Australia are in it

It's about the colonisers vs the colonials.

 

[Flem274*]

If Australia lose the Ashes they will go back to being 'a team in transition'; which generally means tossing out perfectly good players because they happen to be over 32 - not going to be around for the next Ashes, y'see - for someone who hit a nice cover drive this week.

So NZers should be supporting England if they want to beat Australia themselves this year.

we'll already be getting a very different australia to the one we'd like to test the team against. no rogers, maybe no harris, haddin will be gone because he won't score any runs or catch a ball away from home, johnson might be gone...

i'd much rather they pummelled you then baz brought them crashing back to earth.

 

[wellAlbidarned]

How can you have neutrals for the Ashes - ffs people Australia are in it

because england are in it

 

[jan]

I would like a 3:2 result in one of the teams's favour.