Who’s batting is actually better?

[loterry1994]

Honest question whose batting is actually better this series? Australia keep getting saved by like one person most their innings to make a decent score. And a lot of their top batters have had real low scores throughout the series. Been big collapses from them with their bottom 6 all series.

England have gotten a similar amount of runs and have at least been way more attacking than Australia.A few good knocks as well from their batters. And seem more stable down the bottom
Order and tail. Still very suspect to some weird tactics to lose wickets in clumps also.

 

[number11]

With this particular tail, England have added luxury to attack. Brook is also a genuine super talent. It's even money. England are more fearless and fortune favours the brave.

 

[Whistler]

England’s batting line up is ahead but they play far more risky cricket which makes games tight. Australia’s batting is nothing special, they are WT champions due to their bowling.

 

[loterry1994]

One thing I’ll say about the aus batting is that their top 4 there hasn’t been much intent to score a bit quicker. You got Warner coming out pretty much in survival mode these days, khawaja one the worse runners in the game. Smith and Marnus aren’t scoring that freely also.