• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which team is currently the best, in 2023?

Test format ofc: top team?


  • Total voters
    58
  • Poll closed .

R!TTER

State Regular
Whereas India have structural problem .
If anything it's a lot down to our selections & sometimes brain dead strategies! Structurally the game's probably never been better in India, no one comes close to our depth in 3 formats combined.
 

Sunil1z

International Regular
If anything it's a lot down to our selections & sometimes brain dead strategies! Structurally the game's probably never been better in India, no one comes close to our depth in 3 formats combined.
By structural I meant poor selection .
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
How likely would England get out for a sub-200 score if the pitch was easier to bat on? England's attack would get a breather and then would take out NZ chasing a likely mountain.

England made a mistake in enforcing the follow-on and they should pay for it with not winning the series and having their ranking affected.
On the bolded part, I already said in my post that I will play the same could would game. :)

What you say could have happened too. But what I am saying is, that might not have happened as well. Hypotheticals don't always play out like we expect them to. Cricket will be boring otherwise.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
On the bolded part, I already said in my post that I will play the same could would game. :)

What you say could have happened too. But what I am saying is, that might not have happened as well. Hypotheticals don't always play out like we expect them to. Cricket will be boring otherwise.
Point is, end of NZ's first innings, there wasn't a compelling reason to have them bat again. It would only give them a sniff to get back in the game whereas 200 runs ahead, even a sub-par England score 2nd innings score would be very difficult for NZ to chase.
 

srbhkshk

International Captain
2018 not really. 2022 yes. Might have even won in Trent bridge.
I probably said it before but 2018 was the closest series I have seen with such a lopsided final result. India had chances to win in all but one of the test matches (and that one was basically marred by rain leading to different conditions for the two teams) - we just didn't have any batsman stand up other than Kohli.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Point is, end of NZ's first innings, there wasn't a compelling reason to have them bat again. It would only give them a sniff to get back in the game whereas 200 runs ahead, even a sub-par England score 2nd innings score would be very difficult for NZ to chase.
NZ could've chased 500 or blocked out for the draw. With the great overhead conditions at the time for seamers and the weather forecast, the follow on was the right decision.
 

PaulLennon

U19 Vice-Captain
I probably said it before but 2018 was the closest series I have seen with such a lopsided final result. India had chances to win in all but one of the test matches (and that one was basically marred by rain leading to different conditions for the two teams) - we just didn't have any batsman stand up other than Kohli.
Having Bhuvi might have flipped a few matches. His loss is very tragic as he is one Indian fast bowler who was decent with the bat.

Lord's 2014, Sydney 2015, Wanderers 2018. Even Cape Town 2018 had a decent partnership with Hardik.

And he was lethal with the ball in helpful conditions - Eng 2014, WI 2016, SA 2018. Eden Gardens vs NZ 2016.

Losing Hardik and Bhuvi both is a great loss to Indian test cricket.
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
Having Bhuvi might have flipped a few matches. His loss is very tragic as he is one Indian fast bowler who was decent with the bat.

Lord's 2014, Sydney 2015, Wanderers 2018. Even Cape Town 2018 had a decent partnership with Hardik.

And he was lethal with the ball in helpful conditions - Eng 2014, WI 2016, SA 2018. Eden Gardens vs NZ 2016.

Losing Hardik and Bhuvi both is a great loss to Indian test cricket.
I am still hopeful Hardik can make a comeback to test cricket.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
Hardik was a mirage but Bhuvi was the real deal. Bowling attack of Bhuvi, Bumrah, Shami and Ishant/Ashwin with Jadeja at 7 would have been the best in business
 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year
Hardik was a mirage but Bhuvi was the real deal. Bowling attack of Bhuvi, Bumrah, Shami and Ishant/Ashwin with Jadeja at 7 would have been the best in business
Yes, but the current attack with the same line-up and Siraj alone instead of Bhuvi is slightly better, isn't it?
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
Yes, but the current attack with the same line-up and Siraj alone instead of Bhuvi is slightly better, isn't it?
Siraj in time can be really great, at the moment he seems bit too raw

you’re underrating Bhuvi imo, he was looking to be our best bowler in SA and was also very good with bat. he could have been Jansen level with the bat if not better
 

PaulLennon

U19 Vice-Captain
Yes, but the current attack with the same line-up and Siraj alone instead of Bhuvi is slightly better, isn't it?
Siraj hasn't hit the highs of Bhuvi.

Bhuvi in that 2016-18 period was devastating, especially on greenish wickets. He averaged 18.5 with the ball.

Siraj, for now seems like Shami and Umesh in that he is a better bowler in Asian conditions than swinging conditions.

Also Bhuvi is a pretty decent bat compared to Siraj who is a complete bunny.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
Bhuvi is more than a decent bat now that I have checked stats. he has a fc 100 and 11 50s in fc, averages 27 which is 6 more than Jansen

thats close to bowling all-rounder territory. even his test avg of 22 is very decent
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bhuvi is more than a decent bat now that I have checked stats. he has a fc 100 and 11 50s in fc, averages 27 which is 6 more than Jansen

thats close to bowling all-rounder territory. even his test avg of 22 is very decent
Bhuvi was quite conditions dependant tbh. Needed the ball moving around to provide any penettation, so that average is a little misleading . Siraj has the potential to be a really valuable all conditions bowler.

Bhuvi's batting was hugely undervalued though. He kept making key contributions with bat and ball and we lost many tests in the 2017-2018 years due to a bad tail when he wasn't selected . Very frustrating to watch.
 

Top