Which Cricket record has most chance of being broken?

[Sunil1z]

Out of these 3 options, which Cricket record do you think has most chance of being broken?

 

[Patience and Accuracy+Gut]

Don’t think either. But 16 tests win in a row seems lot more achievable.

 

[Coronis]

16 tests is the most likely of the three - give England a year and a half with a dominant team.

 

[Aidan11]

Australian one most likely but realistically I can't see any of them getting broken.

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

No one’s touching Bradman. Ever

 

[shortpitched713]

The Test victories one may seem "easiest. But I think the "not lose series is ultimately easier. But you'd need a meaningful gap in quality.

 

[Ali TT]

I could see a future in test cricket where it becomes a more niche format and some dominant side comes along and repeats or beats the two team records. Bradman's average seems less likely, except over a very short career.

Beyond those three, I don't think anyone will pass Lohmann's bowling average for minimum 100 wickets at 10.75.

I think Tendulkar's 51 test centuries might be safe for some time, unless Root carries on for another decade. Probably his 100 international centuries too.

Outside international cricket, no one is ever going past Hobbs's 1999 FC centuries or Wilfred Rhodes 4204 wickets. In the modern era, will anyone pass Gayle's 22 T20 centuries?

 

[howitzer]

I could see a future in test cricket where it becomes a more niche format and some dominant side comes along and repeats or beats the two team records. Bradman's average seems less likely, except over a very short career.

Beyond those three, I don't think anyone will pass Lohmann's bowling average for minimum 100 wickets at 10.75.

I think Tendulkar's 51 test centuries might be safe for some time, unless Root carries on for another decade. Probably his 100 international centuries too.

Outside international cricket, no one is ever going past Hobbs's 1999 FC centuries or Wilfred Rhodes 4204 wickets. In the modern era, will anyone pass Gayle's 22 T20 centuries?

Party like it's...

 

[Coronis]

I could see a future in test cricket where it becomes a more niche format and some dominant side comes along and repeats or beats the two team records. Bradman's average seems less likely, except over a very short career.

Beyond those three, I don't think anyone will pass Lohmann's bowling average for minimum 100 wickets at 10.75.

I think Tendulkar's 51 test centuries might be safe for some time, unless Root carries on for another decade. Probably his 100 international centuries too.

Outside international cricket, no one is ever going past Hobbs's 1999 FC centuries or Wilfred Rhodes 4204 wickets. In the modern era, will anyone pass Gayle's 22 T20 centuries?

Maybe someone like Shubman Gill? He has 5 and he’s only 24.

 

[Archer6K]

Maybe someone like Shubman Gill? He has 5 and he’s only 24.

Probably not because the only T20’s he plays are the IPL and International’s

 

[Coronis]

Probably not because the only T20’s he plays are the IPL and International’s

Meh I only looked at the top centurymakers for young players.

 

[Ali TT]

Party like it's...

It's an even more crazy record than I first remembered.

 

[Molehill]

16 tests is the most likely of the three - give England a year and a half with a dominant team.

Even if England had a dominant team, they'd be playing half those games in England, chances are the rain scuppers one.

I don't see any of them being broken.

 

[Molehill]

I could see a future in test cricket where it becomes a more niche format and some dominant side comes along and repeats or beats the two team records. Bradman's average seems less likely, except over a very short career.

Beyond those three, I don't think anyone will pass Lohmann's bowling average for minimum 100 wickets at 10.75.

I think Tendulkar's 51 test centuries might be safe for some time, unless Root carries on for another decade. Probably his 100 international centuries too.

Outside international cricket, no one is ever going past Hobbs's 1999 FC centuries or Wilfred Rhodes 4204 wickets. In the modern era, will anyone pass Gayle's 22 T20 centuries?

No one's going past that, probably not the 199 either!!

I reckon the T20 tons will be beaten given how many more Leagues there are around the world now, although it won't be an Indian that does it.