When will England win the World Cup

[Sanz]

im quite sure that anyone who believes that nehra is a better fast bowler than caddick someone whos taken more than 200 wickets in test cricket should not be released from the mental hospital soon

Another assumption on your part. I never said that Nehra is a better bowler than Caddick. I said Nehra Bowled better(than Caddick) in World CUP. I think you should be sent to hospital for treatment of schizophrenia.

did nehra take 4 wickets against australia?no he didnt

Did Caddick take more wickets than Nehra in favoravle conditions ?? NO, he didnt.

ok so mcgrath didnt get any wickets in that match in which bichel got 7. so mcgrath is worse than caddick and nehra. you're theory absolutely baffles me.

You are wrong, Mcgrath did take a wicket in that game. Did it ever occur to you that Mcgrath bowled 8 of his 9 over in the first spell itself whereas Bichel was used by Ponting in multiple spells. And I have never ever suggested that Nehra is a better bowler than Mcgrath or Caddick. It's the schizophrenic in you that gives such ideas.

and mcgrath took none....whats ur point here?

Mcgrath took ONE. My point is that Caddick is a very average bowler in ODIs. While Nehra is definately not a better than Caddick, He bowled better than Caddick in a tournament called WORLD CUP.

yea cause lanka batting is as good as the australian batting lineup?

Well the difference is Caddick's 4-Wickets weren't enough for an England's Win, Nehra's 4-Wicket were. Sri Lanka is a good team which reached in the Semi Finals of the world cup by beating NZ & WI and by not losing against SA. That means 3 top teams in their group.

yea because caddick isnt a good bowler in the death. i think anyone whos followed caddick's career would know that,but unforunately you didnt and yet u rate nehra a guy who cant even land 6 balls an over without bowling one down leg side

The simple fact that you are comparing Caddick with Nehra tells a lot about Caddick's bowling. If caddick is not a good bowler at death then it means he is not a good bowler. Please show me a post where I have rated Nehra higher than Caddick.

seriously have you hear of flintoff????

I love it when people jump from one name to another. Is caddick same as Flintoff ?? Are you going to compare all of england Bowlers to Nehra ? Why dont you pick one and then compare their performance in the World Cup against Nehra's Individually.

 

[Sanz]

No, you won the toss and the rest was a natural progression.

No, If that was the case then we would have lost the Super Six game against Kenya, where we were in a similar situation.

 

[Sanz]

Failed for non-Cricketing reasons.

I would be interested to know some of those non-cricketing reasons.

 

[marc71178]

I would be interested to know some of those non-cricketing reasons.

Erm, I think you already know them

 

[marc71178]

No, If that was the case then we would have lost the Super Six game against Kenya, where we were in a similar situation.

No, because India and England are fairly close to each other, Kenya and India are not.

 

[Sanz]

No, because India and England are fairly close to each other, Kenya and India are not.

Take a look at the following games :- http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_dat...ARDS/POOL-B/RSA_WI_WC2003_ODI1_09FEB2003.html

http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_dat...ARDS/POOL-B/SL_WI_WC2003_ODI34_28FEB2003.html

http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_dat...RDS/POOL-B/RSA_SL_WC2003_ODI40_03MAR2003.html

Looking at these, it doesn't really say much about the conditions.Infact it seems to me that England and Pakistan didn't fight hard enough after losing the toss.

 

[tooextracool]

Another assumption on your part. I never said that Nehra is a better bowler than Caddick. I said Nehra Bowled better(than Caddick) in World CUP. I think you should be sent to hospital for treatment of schizophrenia.

so nehra has a better avg than mcgrath in the wc...so nehra bowled better than mcgrath in the wc too??isnt you're nick here an abbreviation of schizophrenia.

Did Caddick take more wickets than Nehra in favoravle conditions ?? NO, he didnt.

did nehra get more wickets against a quality batting attack than caddick???NO HE DIDNT and thats what matters.

You are wrong, Mcgrath did take a wicket in that game. Did it ever occur to you that Mcgrath bowled 8 of his 9 over in the first spell itself whereas Bichel was used by Ponting in multiple spells. And I have never ever suggested that Nehra is a better bowler than Mcgrath or Caddick. It's the schizophrenic in you that gives such ideas.

did it also occur to you that caddick did the same??
you obviously dont have much of a brain...

Well the difference is Caddick's 4-Wickets weren't enough for an England's Win, Nehra's 4-Wicket were. Sri Lanka is a good team which reached in the Semi Finals of the world cup by beating NZ & WI and by not losing against SA. That means 3 top teams in their group.

does that make their batting lineup as good as australias then???think before you right you paedo

The simple fact that you are comparing Caddick with Nehra tells a lot about Caddick's bowling. If caddick is not a good bowler at death then it means he is not a good bowler.

and mcgrath isnt a great bowler at the death either...so is he a bad ODI bowler??

I love it when people jump from one name to another. Is caddick same as Flintoff ?? Are you going to compare all of england Bowlers to Nehra ? Why dont you pick one and then compare their performance in the World Cup against Nehra's Individually.

heres you're quote "Excuse me ?? Nehra did bowl better than all those so called GOOD bowlers of England aka Mr. Caddick, Anderson and every other bowler. Try again."

i love it when ppl with dyslexia try to blame what other people write! from what i can see u said nehra bowled better than everyone in the english side. so flintoff is definetly valid in this discussion. seriously you dont read what anyone writes..even yourself!!

 

[Neil Pickup]

If we don't progress from "state and re-state" towards "structured argument" soon, then it's going to be bye-bye-thread time.

Well, we have progressed (or should that be regressed?) to the calling each other names stage.

Well done to all concerned (!)

Bye Bye Thread, it is.