Gob
International Coach
Alan DavidsonIn terms of left armers I'd put Wasim (by miles), Wagner, and Johnson ahead of Vaas, with Starc and Boult on about par, and Zaheer behind.
Alan DavidsonIn terms of left armers I'd put Wasim (by miles), Wagner, and Johnson ahead of Vaas, with Starc and Boult on about par, and Zaheer behind.
Definitely. Bruce Reid too, but I was referring to WIC Fan's post (based on players he'd watched on tv) so went for more recent players.Alan Davidson
But Lara and Sobers are in your team. They can't nullify Murali.Murrali would be nullified by Lara and Sobers, no use picking him, Warne is better... a leggie is a lot better...
Bat Jaddu at 6?Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Tendulkar
Viv
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Jadeja
Hadlee
Marshall
Has Cummins retired? Good news for the coming winter.Vaas? Seriously? At the very least Cummins and Donald are eons ahead of him.
Worth a try certainly. Jaddu would relish the opportunity to convert something that would have been 80* into a double or triple hundred.Bat Jaddu at 6?
And Kane to replace Bradman, oops Tendulkar.Think I've settled on my team finally after going back and forth for years:
Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Sachin
Viv
Sobers
Gilchrist +
Imran*
Hadlee
Marshall
Warne
***Steve Smith to likely replace Viv by the time his career is over.
What if Hobbs was conceived by future Kohli who was sent in to the past to reset test cricket after its being killed off by a post apocalypse regime in favour of t20 cricket #toomuchdarkif you send Virat Kohli in a time machine back to the 40s then he would possibly average 100. So it is pointless to even pick guys like Hobbs now lol
What does coordinated mean here?Hadlee was a faster, more coordinated version of McGrath who could bat and field.
Very true. Made up for it by being better at cricket though.McGrath was great, but looked a bit gangly and unco (especially in the field but even slightly in his delivery)
Disagree, you don't "need" to. You set the parameters you want. There's no necessity to adjust past players standards to match modern professionalism if you don't want to.KoK's theories about players pre '60s fail to impress. Whenever players from different eras are discussed, in any sports, it is customary to acknowledge the cream of each era. If we were to take his theories/opinions into account and apply them to any sport, the likes of Jesse Owens, Herb Elliott, Joe Louis and Juan Fangio would be consigned to the ranks of also-rans. When looking at these champions of yesteryear, we need to consider how they would perform given modern training, sophisticated equipment and financial rewards that are available today.
Completely agree. The great Peter Snell (probably NZ's greatest ever sportsman - only man since 1920 to win the 800/1500 double at the Olympics which he did in '64) still has the NZ 800m record which he set in 1962. Imagine how fast he would have been with modern training, shoes, tracks, diet etc. Even great middle distance runners like John Walker and Nick Willis (admittedly both better at 1500) never beat Snell's 800m time.KoK's theories about players pre '60s fail to impress. Whenever players from different eras are discussed, in any sports, it is customary to acknowledge the cream of each era. If we were to take his theories/opinions into account and apply them to any sport, the likes of Jesse Owens, Herb Elliott, Joe Louis and Juan Fangio would be consigned to the ranks of also-rans. When looking at these champions of yesteryear, we need to consider how they would perform given modern training, sophisticated equipment and financial rewards that are available today.