Basically as Broncoman said we would just like to increase involment of the managers, out of the 30 managers we have the vast amount just come here and post their 11 names and that's all we see of them until next week. We understand that you all have other things to do and time might be a problem in some cases, but I guess alot of you couldn't name half your fellow managers without looking at the sitebroncoman said:Megan, we dont want to punish people, the game is for fun, we would much prefer to come up with something that people would enjoy doing to get everyone more involved.
As Marc said, making people do reports wont be brought in, but it would be good to see the majority of matches reported on, even if it is only 1 manager from each game doing a report.
Ican think of a few, but I don't think they're legal!Eyes_Only said:Is there another way of "punishing" people that may be introduced?
Thanks for clearing that up guys...I know I have been quiet of late but My Grandfather has been ill and I am in the middle of moving...marc71178 said:Ican think of a few, but I don't think they're legal!
How would you work out which manager was to do which game though??broncoman said:Megan, we dont want to punish people, the game is for fun, we would much prefer to come up with something that people would enjoy doing to get everyone more involved.
As Marc said, making people do reports wont be brought in, but it would be good to see the majority of matches reported on, even if it is only 1 manager from each game doing a report.
20 what is it? Doesn't seem too long to me...lord_of_darkness said:Season cut to 20 sounds good aswell , cause now its going long etc
Already on the cards I believe.lord_of_darkness said:And the strikes system for not posting teams should be worked out so long term members get a better offer.. or something close