ankitj
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not really lol.It's not even a dig, a genuine question, are you an English teacher?
Not really lol.It's not even a dig, a genuine question, are you an English teacher?
That is so nostalgic.I am sorry Sir, please don't call my guardian![]()
I mean, it's exactly what i'd expect.not sure I've Waqar above Bedser
be real, you rate Bedser too, seems just the type of bowler you'd likeI mean, it's exactly what i'd expect.
I used to rate him Above Anderson, now I rate him as top 26/27 Bowler, Just below Anderson and above Lohmann.be real, you rate Bedser too, seems just the type of bowler you'd like
I rate Lohmann well below, around 50 really alongside Turner; just ahead of Richardson.I used to rate him Above Anderson, now I rate him as top 26/27 Bowler, Just below Anderson and above Lohmann.
But I rate Waqar in my Top 20.
dw I've Jimmy above Waqar tooI used to rate him Above Anderson, now I rate him as top 26/27 Bowler, Just below Anderson and above Lohmann.
But I rate Waqar in my Top 20.
Where do you have Richardson?I rate Lohmann well below, around 50 really alongside Turner; just ahead of Richardson.
63Where do you have Richardson?
And went too far, loldw I've Jimmy above Waqar too
Absolute cinemaWaqar is just below philander in my all time list.
Hazlewood, Rabada, Cummins, aswin, Lyon, anderson etc all are better than him.
You two could be best budsAbsolute cinema
Hazelwood and Lyon better than Waqar is just wow. Williamson better than him was pretty wow too tbh.Waqar is just below philander in my all time list.
Hazlewood, Rabada, Cummins, aswin, Lyon, anderson etc all are better than him.
Matt Henry>Waqar Younis.Hazelwood and Lyon better than Waqar is just wow. Williamson better than him was pretty wow too tbh.
The great man is underrated still it seems. Before there was Woakes there was Agarkar, showing what the world's greatest all-rounder and bowler wrapped into one package could look like.Agarkar at 32.