Warne shows his superiority over Macgill

[Shane Warne]

As if there was any doubt.

 

[SquidAU]

I think everyone here wold agree that Warne is better than MacGill. I have no doubt.

 

[Richard]

As if there was any doubt.

There wasn't - on most people's parts.

 

[Tom Halsey]

More importantly, Warne today showed his superiority over Murali.

 

[marc71178]

More importantly, Warne today showed his superiority over Murali.

How so?

Because he got one of the weaker tails out in very helpful conditions?

 

[Tom Halsey]

And the 'brilliant' Murali got smashed in very helpful conditions.

 

[marc71178]

22-3-60-0 - hardly smashed.

 

[Tom Halsey]

By his 'brilliant' standards it is.

 

[Armadillo]

i don't think there is any doubt that warne is better than Macgill, however tom you must realise that an offie can be better than a leggie, oh and have fun truencing off school tomorrow

 

[Tom Halsey]

That is in no way my fault. You know that.

How is an offie always better than a leggie?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

More importantly, Warne today showed his superiority over Murali.

Just reached home and logged on and I'm greeted by two stupid comments...

In response to this one, Murali has more wickets in this match to date. 6 for 119 beats 5 for 116 last time I checked.

 

[Rik]

By his 'brilliant' standards it is.

So your judging someone for not taking wickets as cheaply as he usually does simply because he's playing the best side in the world? He took 6 in the 1st innings, and Hayden, who's a damn good player of spin, just got hold of him for once. No worries, he'll be back.

 

[Craig]

If Murali joins Essex, Halsey wont stop talking him up.

 

[twctopcat]

So Murali takes 6-59 and 5-153 against Warne's "stunning" 5-116 and suddenly Warne has the better of him. Let's wait until the end of day 5 for such an analysis. One swallow doesn't make a summer.