royGilchrist
State 12th Man
you can add Pakistan to that list as well, teams who will benefit from the absence of Warne.
No I ment India not favorites this time?Originally posted by SRTgrSDB
No, i'm not talking about India, nor do i think Indians would have been in trouble facing him.I think England and SA would certainly like to avoid him.
How can they be?? when the mighty English team is all set to set the stage on fireOriginally posted by Rik
No I ment India not favorites this time?Originally posted by SRTgrSDB
No, i'm not talking about India, nor do i think Indians would have been in trouble facing him.I think England and SA would certainly like to avoid him.
Only because they haven't needed him!Originally posted by Rik
Oh...and McGrath...who (and totally off the subject here) has figures of 14-1-67-0 in the VB Series so far...he's even bowled less overs than Darren Lehmann :O
Unlike the Indian side that has 4 specialist bowlers, and on any one day 3 of them are likely to be expensive in addition to cobbling together 10 overs from part-timers!Well Australia already has two bowlers that are expensive, one is LEE and the other is Watson.So if a third bowler also concedes many runs then it would be a problem for the Aussies.
But this does show that they do not have to rely on him all the time.Originally posted by Rik
Oh...and McGrath...who (and totally off the subject here) has figures of 14-1-67-0 in the VB Series so far...he's even bowled less overs than Darren Lehmann :O
Australia had a problem with their fifth bowler, with that team I see something wrong with the fourth as well..You will have to replace warne with a good attacking bowler. Blewett is hardly that ?Hayden
Gilchrist
Ponting
Martyn
Lehmann
Bevan
Blewett
Watson (or, my preference, Steve Waugh)
Lee
Gillespie
McGrath