You literally took a 300+ game against India where Mclaren(who nobody knows about) made a 71 and India had a **** bowling attack, second one was again against a **** attack of a washed up WI.
The only proper great innings was against SL attack and then dozed of on "pressure situation". I mean if you are taking the CT game vs India and WI **** line ups then Kohli too made a 96 against Ban in ct17semis lol. But nobody counts that because it wasn't against some great attack. He already got a 40+ in finals of ct13 on top of that too where he was the highest scorer on a rained out pitch.
Also, why do I have to specifically see Kohli's records in chasing in ICC tournaments when he already averages 50+ in WC against top teams in comparison to Abd's 43 ???
I mean a WC is the epitome of pressure and Kohli has delivered in them better than Abd right ?
Also, "telling most difficult to bowl" doesn't equate to being the "best batsman". Sachin alo said Cronje was difficult to face, does that make Cronje better than the true great now ??
Most of the Aussie players(including Glenn) takes Lara's name as the most difficult to bowl too. Does that mean Lara was better than Sachin in tests ? When the clear indication is that Sachin pulls up as better overall.
Also, you never saw Kohli bashing Malinga,Starc,Johnson on Aus wickets ? Or Steyn,Morne,Rabada on SA wickets ?
Boult etc in NZ were belted by him too lol.
He played these guys in both away and home in a large sample size and bashed them all over the world, including the WCs.
That's why I said just pitches doesn't make someone's average against a bowler go from 30s to 60s.
You literally took a 300+ game against India where Mclaren(who nobody knows about) made a 71 and India had a **** bowling attack, second one was again against a **** attack of a washed up WI.
The only proper great innings was against SL attack and then dozed of on "pressure situation". I mean if you are taking the CT game vs India and WI **** line ups then Kohli too made a 96 against Ban in ct17semis lol. But nobody counts that because it wasn't against some great attack. He already got a 40+ in finals of ct13 on top of that too where he was the highest scorer on a rained out pitch.
Also, why do I have to specifically see Kohli's records in chasing in ICC tournaments when he already averages 50+ in WC against top teams in comparison to Abd's 43 ???
I mean a WC is the epitome of pressure and Kohli has delivered in them better than Abd right ?
Also, "telling most difficult to bowl" doesn't equate to being the "best batsman". Sachin alo said Cronje was difficult to face, does that make Cronje better than the true great now ??
Most of the Aussie players(including Glenn) takes Lara's name as the most difficult to bowl too. Does that mean Lara was better than Sachin in tests ? When the clear indication is that Sachin pulls up as better overall.
Also, you never saw Kohli bashing Malinga,Starc,Johnson on Aus wickets ? Or Steyn,Morne,Rabada on SA wickets ?
Boult etc in NZ were belted by him too lol.
He played these guys in both away and home in a large sample size and bashed them all over the world, including the WCs.
That's why I said just pitches doesn't make someone's average against a bowler go from 30s to 60s.
Where are you getting these stats from ?You are counting Malinga?. He was never a great ODI bowler. Everyone used to smash him. Lol
Kohli faced Boult, Johnson, Starc in 13 matches on SENA wickets. He averages just 34 with a strike rate of 84 in those matches.
Even against Anderson and Broad co, Kohli faced them in 11 matches by averaging 19.5 with a strike rate of 71.5 in those matches.
The only good bowling attack he was great was against Rabada, Morkel during his absolute peak year 2018. He failed majorly against quality pace attack rest of the times.
I am really not in a mood to debate cricketers right now, but that's some absolute bullshit.You are counting Malinga?. He was never a great ODI bowler. Everyone used to smash him. Lol
Kohli faced Boult, Johnson, Starc in 13 matches on SENA wickets. He averages just 34 with a strike rate of 84 in those matches.
Even against Anderson and Broad co, Kohli faced them in 11 matches by averaging 19.5 with a strike rate of 71.5 in those matches.
The only good bowling attack he was great was against Rabada, Morkel during his absolute peak year 2018. He failed majorly against quality pace attack rest of the times.
ESPN statsguru.Where are you getting these stats from ?
I am just stating that Kohli stats are superior because of weaker bowling. He was never great against quality pace attack. If you have counter points, feel free to express. Else just shut the **** up and go instead of criticizing. Cry baby Kohli fansI am really not in a mood to debate cricketers right now, but that's some absolute bull****.
Me reading many PC threads.I can't decide whose utterly dodgy criticisms of the player they don't fancy I like less.
He has better WC than AB? Only in 2023 due to the home advantage in India. And he was a run accumulator not a genuine match winner. You can't compare it to AB who played on higher gears even outside home. Both are equal in terms of impact I say.Revisiting this, ABD could be better given his record vs Aus(strongest team of his time), and his SR(which does reflect in abilities to change the game in ways no one outside Viv could). But he never had as good a WC as Kohli, plus Kohli batted higher