Not half.marc71178 said:Never realised quite how good his record opening in ODI's was.
50 games for 46.84 is very impressive.
they dont beat us at many sports these days-hardly any that arent mainstream US sportsSquidAU said:Good on the USA for getting into a tournament against the best cricketing nations. At least it gives the Aussie's a chance to thrash them at something.....![]()
![]()
One of those Haynes partnerships was a record opening stand against South Africa in ODIs and Knight and Hussain broke it in 1999\2000 at Bloemfontein.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Tests
2 Matches
2 Inns
0 NOs
111 runs
55.50 Avge
HS - 91
ODIs
50 Matches
50 Inns
5 NOs
2108 runs
46.84 Avge
5x100
14x50
HS - 153
Involved in a 152-run partnership with Haynes in 1992/92, an unbroken 175-run partnership w/Haynes in 1991/92, an unbroken 154-run stand w/Haynes in 1991/92.
And after a 98-run stand with Campbell (in 10.1 overs) in 1999/00, Lara went on to score 117 off 62 balls, reaching his hundred off 45 balls with 17 fours and 4 sixes. Admittedly it was against Bangladesh.
He's just like Tendulkar - both with better averages opening than in the middle, but IMO less use to the team cause than with someone else opening and them playing in the middle.marc71178 said:Never realised quite how good his record opening in ODI's was.
50 games for 46.84 is very impressive.
I feel USA vs Iraq would be worse. Arn't Iraq an ICC Associate?Warne is god said:USA v. Australia? That could be messy
Actually, they aren't even a member of the ICC.Rik said:I feel USA vs Iraq would be worse. Arn't Iraq an ICC Associate?
Ahhhh well, I'm pretty sure the UAE would doSamuel_Vimes said:Actually, they aren't even a member of the ICC.
Iran is an Affiliate though. That's the same level as Norway, so not likely to meet USA in the foreseeable future.
I wouldn't be so sure - people always underrate the minnows and that can occasionally turn round and shock!Tim said:I seriously think NZ & Aus will each pile on several batting records providing they bat first of course.