straw man
Hall of Fame Member
I don't think it's a great miscarriage of justice that Shipley, Sears and O'Rourke have been given a run for NZ ahead of Nathan Smith, so far. It's arguable either way, though those bowlers have the advantage of height and pace (probably all three quicker than him) that suggest they could progress to international level.
Smith is still a good prospect though - he's excelled at domestic level to a greater degree, for longer, than the three above. Now has 105 FC wickets, plus 100 white-ball wickets, which is more than Shipley (72 + 86), Sears (58 + 76) and O'Rourke (50 + 50). He leads the Wellington attack. While he isn't express he still looks quick enough, nips the ball around and from what I can tell, bowls a very consistent length. Seems a very competitive personality and can bat.
If he was a third or fourth-seamer type then his record would have seen him debut for NZ already imo. It's a lot tougher when he wants the new ball. Still, hope we can find a way to give him a few NZ matches while we wait for longer-term spots to open up.
Smith is still a good prospect though - he's excelled at domestic level to a greater degree, for longer, than the three above. Now has 105 FC wickets, plus 100 white-ball wickets, which is more than Shipley (72 + 86), Sears (58 + 76) and O'Rourke (50 + 50). He leads the Wellington attack. While he isn't express he still looks quick enough, nips the ball around and from what I can tell, bowls a very consistent length. Seems a very competitive personality and can bat.
If he was a third or fourth-seamer type then his record would have seen him debut for NZ already imo. It's a lot tougher when he wants the new ball. Still, hope we can find a way to give him a few NZ matches while we wait for longer-term spots to open up.