I agree on this with u.Its a great idea.Muzza said:I think all members of WCC should be aloud to vote in a new board at the start of next season, with the exception of GB, and Rich who deservedly hold a place. As for all the other positions they should be for us, the members, to decide, just like the do in Fifa or other sports bodies!
Who here agrees?
What you mean with what I just said about trading players on? The problem is if we have unequal trading and trading players on the game will become seriously complicated!age_master said:why not, i see no problem with that, also it was voted on and people tended to agree with this viewpoint
How does the balance goes.U have to retain 10 in the end before the draft.So U can trade 3 of 1 or 2 for 1.And in the end decide on which 10 u want to retain before the DP and all others are gone in the Draft.By doing this if u give three above avg players to a team which has just a single good player and no one else.So the team become strong by getting 3 players who are not as good as the one traded but can balance the week side.Rik said:I for one do not want unequal trading as GB has made it so that each side must have 16 players, no more, no less. Allow people to trade multiple players for one player takes away the balance.
Actually last season we had unequal trading and it didnt cause that much problem, the problem was when it came to draft pick. As long as every team ends up with 10 players before the draft uneven trading should be allowed.Rik said:What you mean with what I just said about trading players on? The problem is if we have unequal trading and trading players on the game will become seriously complicated!