RacistThey should just combine the uae and the pakis.
lol, united arab emiratepians?For some reason I cant get excited by this team compared to the other associates.
Just seeing if there is any player creating some buzz that should be followed. Are there are UAEpians on this site?
mostly expats. Locals cbf about the game.Are there any actual UAEniks in their squad or is it entirely ex-pat subcontinentals?
He only turned up for Netherlands because he felt he didn't have a shot at the Australian team I think? He then played for Australia 3 months after he played for Netherlands in the WT20 which makes a greater mockery of the system.TBF Nannes is actually Australian; only qualified for the Netherlands through his parents.
I don't look down on expat teams as such (I'm English, ffs; Morgan & Ballance make throwing stones from my glasshouse hypocritical), but having a team made exclusively of non-natives does make a bit of a mockery of the idea of national sides.
With cricket's flexible rules on eligibility, if a cash rich but talent poor country was so minded we could conceivably end up with a situation like the Qatar handball team, which is manned more or less exclusively by expats flying flags of convenience for the cheddar. They were runners-up in the recent world cup.
I think he was having a bob each way; he knew he could represent his parents' country without it adversely affecting his eligibility for his homeland.He only turned up for Netherlands because he felt he didn't have a shot at the Australian team I think? He then played for Australia 3 months after he played for England in the WT20 which makes a greater mockery of the system.
My post wasn't aimed at you ftr
That handball situation does sound like a bit of a farce. I really think the eligibility rules need to be tightened up, but if you're working overseas for a good number of years then I don't see why it should be looked down upon when you turn up for your adopted country.
didn't realise the UAEghan star was 42 years old.Khurram Khan is Ashwell's favourite player.
Hate it when people look down on some of the expat teams. So it's ok for Rankin and Nannes to jump ship to improve their careers but when a bunch of guys who have to juggle full time jobs with cricket represent the country they are working in then suddenly it's just not right. Of course it's great if the locals are more involved but expats seriously help to grow the game in places where cricket would have never ever been played without them. Is that not more important than which side of an arbitrary line you were born in?
I've got no gripe with players who move for non-cricketing reasons and then end up representing their adopted country down the line at all. I do think players who actually move for cricket playing international cricket for their new sides takes away some of the point of national sides though.He only turned up for Netherlands because he felt he didn't have a shot at the Australian team I think? He then played for Australia 3 months after he played for Netherlands in the WT20 which makes a greater mockery of the system.
My post wasn't aimed at you ftr
That handball situation does sound like a bit of a farce. I really think the eligibility rules need to be tightened up, but if you're working overseas for a good number of years then I don't see why it should be looked down upon when you turn up for your adopted country.
He isn't. He's 43.didn't realise the UAEghan star was 42 years old.
Yea this.UAE has 80% expat population,you expect the side to be full of Emiratis?