Second this request.Mods,could this please be renamed to "Pro Cycling Thread"?
Vimes, why does Pozzovivo have the no.1 for the Giro? I thought without last years winner it would go to 2nd place (Uran/EQS)? Or is it always the case that the teams classification winner gets next chop at it?
Not that it matters obvs, just thought it seemed different from what I thought to be the norm.
Can say the same about any of them though, must admit I did wonder about Wiggins as well. Harsh but the way it is for that sport and probably always will be now.Love to think he's clean, but it is cycling so those nagging doubts are hard to shift.
Tbf to Froome, he looked completely ****ed last night but kept hauling his arse up the mountain but the stage win where he effectively won the tour was not a good lookYou're better off winning and pretending that you're completely cooked; than look as though you could keep on riding. It's like the opposite of any other psychology related to an endurance sport.
Only upset as it a Brit winning. if he was an Italian they wouldn't care. Stupid surrender monkeys.Tbf to Froome, he looked completely ****ed last night but kept hauling his arse up the mountain but the stage win where he effectively won the tour was not a good look
Anyway, history says that most of the contenders are on the juice and you have to laugh at the frogs' reaction - they've been doping in this thing for 40+ years FFS so why get the ****s now
also if you haven't seen this watch it, it's so uplifting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zxnA4asj44Paris Roubaix was fun. Also an Aussie won so that's cool