• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Top Bowlers with 10 or Fewer Tests

Slifer

International Captain
Clarke at least went on Rebel tours and wasn't selected due to that. Daniel somehow found himself behind Davis and Milton Small.
Daniel must've pissed someone off. Forgot to mention Roy Gilchrist but it goes without saying that he was nuts!!!
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Fen Creswell, the other NZer in that list, very gentle inswingers. Very gentle.

I assume a product of uncovered pitches.
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
Wayne Daniel only just missed the cut.

10 Tests; 56 @ 25.27 and 817 FC wickets @ 22.47

Definitely better bowler than some others on the list.
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
The pick of the fast bowlers would have to be Procter, Cowie, Daniel, Martindale and Schultz. Appleyard is clearly to best spinner, probably followed by Iverson.
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
As mentioned, here are the pre-WWI bowlers who fitted the criteria. Some fairly impressive FC careers, but that is to be expected of the era. At the foot of the list is Bernard Bosanquet, the inventor of the 'googly'. He was apparently quite arratic and his lack of control would explain his average (Test and FC) being higher than most regular bowlers of the era.

PlayerTestsTest WicketsFirst Class Wickets
Fred Martin214 @ 10.071,317 @ 17.35
J.J. Ferris961 @ 12.70812 @ 17.54
Harry Dean311 @ 13.901,301 @ 18.14
Albert Trott526 @ 15.001,674 @ 21.09
Tom Kendall214 @ 15.3640 @ 16.64
Walter Lees526 @ 17.961,402 @ 21.40
George Simpson-Hayward523 @ 18.26503 @ 21.39
"Bonner" Middleton624 @ 18.42140 @ 18.02
Fred Morley416 @ 18.501,274 @ 13.43
Walter Brearley417 @ 21.11844 @ 19.31
Sailor Young212 @ 21.83514 @ 23.37
Ted Peate931 @ 22.031,074 @ 13.49
H.V. Horden746 @ 23.37228 @ 16.36
Bernard Bosanquet725 @ 24.16629 @ 23.80
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Simpson-Hayward bowled under-arm, didn't he? Lobbing the ball rather than rolling it. iirc he took most of his wickets against emergent South Africa on their matting wickets

So hard to evaluate bowlers from that era, especially if they played most or all of their tests against SA. And the wickets could be pretty much anything. Middleton was a worry until I realised there were two 'n's in his first name.
 
Last edited:

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Wayne Daniel is one genuinely world class fast bowler who only played 10 Tests. For some reason Clive Lloyd didn't like him.
I think he originally dropped out when Garner and Croft emerged to join Roberts and Holding. Once Marshall came along a couple of years later, Daniel was probably ranked sixth in the WI pecking order. But as others have said, it's harder to understand why one or two other occasionally played instead of him. One piece I read referred to his strike rate with the fairer gender. That's not so unusual, but, maybe he he dallied with one of Lloyd's favourites.
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
Simpson-Hayward bowled under-arm, didn't he? Lobbing the ball rather than rolling it. iirc he took most of his wickets against emergent South Africa on their matting wickets

So hard to evaluate bowlers from that era, especially if they played most or all of their tests against SA. And the wickets could be pretty much anything. Middleton was a worry until I realised there were two 'n's in his first name.
Under-arm, round-arm, 'bowling' against weak opponents ... all factors contributing to my decision to leave out pre-WWI from the initial list.
Interestingly, Fred Morley was regarded as England's fastest bowler of the era. He never recovered from an injury and passed away when he was 33.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Jack Iverson is one of the most interesting characters in the history of cricket.

If you can get hold of Gideon Haigh's book "Mystery Spinner", it'll be one of the best cricket books you ever read.
 

Flem274*

123/5
tom pritchard

i completely understand taking the cash and the security for his family in a less certain world, but my whimsical side wishes he had chosen the chance at test match greatness and been remembered as one of our best ever.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Jack Iverson is one of the most interesting characters in the history of cricket.

If you can get hold of Gideon Haigh's book "Mystery Spinner", it'll be one of the best cricket books you ever read.
Sounds interesting, just ordered it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red

Top