• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Top 5 modern day greats

Top 5 modern day greats


  • Total voters
    90

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
You're becoming a joke with your obsession with fast bowlers SS - Walsh is a better player than Tendulkar??
Walsh would probably win you more matches than Tendulkar would. Meaning, a crappy team with Tendulkar vs. crappy team with Walsh, I bet the latter would win more (though probably lose more too).

In any case, it's an unfair comparison to do bowlers and batsman in the same team. When I see a question like this, I automatically think of who I'd pick first if I were building a team. And unless there is a Bradman available, I'll go with a very good fast bowler over a great batsman.

Now, if your criteria is comparing Walsh to other fast bowlers, vs. comparing Tendulkar to other batsmen, then Tendulkar would come out ahead. But that's not the way I thought this poll was. Head to head, I'd take a Walsh in my team over a Tendulkar - yes. Obviously substitute Donald for Walsh too - it was just a mistake that I didn't see him. Donald would replace either Walsh or Waqar (depending if we're talking about the very early Waqar or the more later one).
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Haha, that's the plan. :D


Oh, and McGrath is the most underrated player of all time. He should have 100% of the votes TBH.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Makes you wonder how any batsman scores any runs with all these superior Beings coming at them all day.
Yea, its a mystery I'd like to solve. My current hypothesis is that the step-and-fetch-it blokes ruin it by taking the ball away just as the real bowlers are about to take another wicket. And I've heard rumors that Irfan Pathan has infiltrated the ranks of the fast bowlers, and is doing a terrible impersonation of a bowler to try to embarrass the profession.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Haha, that's the plan. :D


Oh, and McGrath is the most underrated player of all time. He should have 100% of the votes TBH.
I'll agree with that.

I'm not sure about Walsh being better than Tendulkar, but a good bowler is certainly of more value to a side than a good batsman for me. A batsman can't win you a test match, they can only make it easier for your bowlers to do it.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Well, Walsh could bowl all day, and had fantastic longetivity. A true wicket-taking bowler transforms a side. In any case, as I said, if we're doing a relative comparison of Walsh vs. his contemporaries and Tendulkar vs. his contemporaries, then Tendulkar was in a higher tier. But to me, the better player is the one you'd pick first for your team if you had a choice between the two.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
I see this poll conforms to CW requirements. Fast bowlers - The irrelevant third option.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
I'll agree with that.

I'm not sure about Walsh being better than Tendulkar, but a good bowler is certainly of more value to a side than a good batsman for me. A batsman can't win you a test match, they can only make it easier for your bowlers to do it.
Not having good batsmen also makes it far easier for your opposition to beat the pants off you.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
Not getting beaten is secondary to winning IMO.
Thats a very simplistic way of putting it. Its not a perfect analogy, but theres a reason countries have ministries of defence, not ministries of attack. And its not wholly to do with the not wanting to appear war-mongering thing.
 

Top