Imagine BMac asking the ump to get the tampered ball changed every over.They can barely get two new balls to behave the same way, a tampered version is a fantasy. What happens if the ball is lost? Ump brings out a pocket knife and cuts around a stencil?
I mean there's an argument for a new ball every over, IMHO. Cricket seems to be the only sport that allows the ball to "age", whether it's natural or otherwise.Change from using a cricket ball to a shot put imo
A cool $22500 spent on balls per testI mean there's an argument for a new ball every over, IMHO. Cricket seems to be the only sport that allows the ball to "age", whether it's natural or otherwise.
Cricket's bastard American cousin definitely not precious about its balls.
The level I used to play at we averaged a new ball every third or fourth (50 over) game.A cool $22500 spent on balls per test
tbf you could resell them to club cricket and make some $ back
Tests would be a lot shorter tbfA cool $22500 spent on balls per test
tbf you could resell them to club cricket and make some $ back
This whole argument about ageing balls seems to be a thinly-disguised campaign to rid the game of spinners.I mean there's an argument for a new ball every over, IMHO. Cricket seems to be the only sport that allows the ball to "age", whether it's natural or otherwise.
Cricket's bastard American cousin definitely not precious about its balls.
Sell them as memorabiliaA cool $22500 spent on balls per test
tbf you could resell them to club cricket and make some $ back