tooextracool said:ahh despite all that we managed to beat them in the 5th test! oh wait they didnt have warne and mcgrath.
The indians just played the attack they were put up against. They may have done just as well against McGrath and Warne, given McGrath's uninspiring return and well we've never really had too many porblems with Warne.marc71178 said:Come now tec, we know that their replacements are just as good as McGrath and Warne are!
We've been told that so many times by certain people!
Dead rubber as well, they probably had a few too many celebratory shrimps and VB's.marc71178 said:Actually they weren't against England, but we can still accept that the main reason we won that game was that ther bowling attack was much weaker than usual...
Ah yes. Thanks for reminding me.Neil Pickup said:Can't be. There were more fight in Ipswich when they got rolled 9-0 by Manure than in Alex Tudor..
So are you a subscriber to Beefy's theroy that Tudor should go and spend some time in the Royal Marines to "toughen him up"?marc71178 said:Gough's injuries were always obvious, Johnson hasn't ever had it on England duty.
Tudor happened to be feeling rough when the chips were down (on more than one occasion)
I'm a subscriber to the school of thought that Tudor ought to consider joining the Brownies to 'toughen him up'.Craig said:So are you a subscriber to Beefy's theroy that Tudor should go and spend some time in the Royal Marines to "toughen him up"?
At nothing else, he has bowled well v Australia (well he certainly was not the worst) and in particular Steve Waugh.
I can imagine the conversation..luckyeddie said:I'm a subscriber to the school of thought that Tudor ought to consider joining the Brownies to 'toughen him up'.
Close enoughLangeveldt said:I can imagine the conversation..
Rikki - "What the hell are you doin' here tudes?"
Oh, that could be applied to the Surrey dressing room aswell