No I mean a fully taped one. Its play resembles the game of cricket far more accurately then the half taped one. Both the batsmen and the bowler have equal chance of doing their thing, as opposed to the half taped one which unfairly sides with the bowler.sqwerty said:Errrr...isn't that the whole idea? I mean who's ever played tapeball with a fully taped ball anyway? I'm sure that's what he means.
Unless you're a finger-spinner. I find it doesn't turn much for me (I usually bowl off-spin) until the tape is deteriorating a fair bit, and then it becomes hard to grip and release out of the hand. That's why when we play tape-ball, the ball has a very prominent seam...at least that gives it chance to drift and dip in the air when bowling spin.jack_sparrow said:No I mean a fully taped one. Its play resembles the game of cricket far more accurately then the half taped one. Both the batsmen and the bowler have equal chance of doing their thing, as opposed to the half taped one which unfairly sides with the bowler.
Isolator said:No, I didn't mean it makes it heavier. But it does make it much harder.
Isolator said:but it was hard and heavier than a normal tennis ball.
r u taking the **** or is that a lotRobertinho said:Two centimetres? Are you joking?...
It's heaps.. it would take like a whole roll of tape.Right arm fast said:r u taking the **** or is that a lot
shankar said:Can anybody who's tried this confirm if you're able to bowl faster with a taped ball as opposed to a plain tennis ball? Because if that's true then an interesting golf ball type effect might be happening.
I'd imagine it's more to do with density rather than weight.Isolator said:I think so. A normal tennis ball is way too light. You need to have some weight... which the tape provides. I could be imagining this, though.
Is it significntly heavier than a tennis ball. If so, then that would obviously be the the main reason for the added pace. But I thought you guys were saying earlier that the tape only made it only harder and not a whole lot heavier?Isolator said:I think so. A normal tennis ball is way too light. You need to have some weight... which the tape provides. I could be imagining this, though.
I'm only concerned about the speed in the air. Regarding the air resistance, that's the point of interest for me - Just because the surface of the ball is smoother for a taped ball, the drag force doesnt reduce significantly. The reason is that the air-surface friction only contributes a small amount to the drag on a blunt body like a sphere.deeps said:as i said, it skids off the pitch more so than anything else. This is due to being less friction on the surface of contact. There's also less air resistance whilst the ball travels, plus a little more weight.
It all factors in