You mean other than going on an 8 fight win streak after the Duffy fight, mostly in Cage Warriors, all 8 of those fights ending in a finish, with Conor winning belts in two weight classes on the way? Looks pretty dominant to me. Conor was the stand-out fighter on the UK and Ireland MMA scene and post-Duffy fight looked like a killer.McCregor himself was only signed because Dana happened to be in Dublin one time, pretty much to get the European views on PPV. And he's gone on to dominate - when he wasn't really a dominant fighter before he was in the UFC.
You might be right, and I certainly think he's a very good fighter. My point was more that he's come into the UFC from outside and completely dominated.You mean other than going on an 8 fight win streak after the Duffy fight, mostly in Cage Warriors, all 8 of those fights ending in a finish, with Conor winning belts in two weight classes on the way? Looks pretty dominant to me. Conor was the stand-out fighter on the UK and Ireland MMA scene and post-Duffy fight looked like a killer.
And yeah, Punk's getting embarrassed. I don't think he understands just how good a kid like Gall is. He's going to get sparked, which is a shame, I like the guy, but he should have stayed in Wrestling.
It's not that I think the boxing system is fair at all. Just comparing the strengths and weaknesses.I think Hendrix is completely right that the system is rigged towards marketability and subject to the whims of a total arsehole, and the sport has almost no integrity or legitimacy as a result.
That said, I think he's understating the quality of the UFC's fighters in practice. And overstating the fairness of the Boxing system in comparison.
I do agree to some extent. I do think the UFC favour marketability when making fights, but don't think that takes away from the legitimacy. The integrity maybe, they've made a few very questionable decisions recently which have hurt their integrity, but the sport hasn't lost any of its legitimacy. As much as it's "rigged" towards marketability, you still have to win fights against the toughest fighters on the planet. Nobody wins a UFC title on marketability alone.I think Hendrix is completely right that the system is rigged towards marketability and subject to the whims of a total arsehole, and the sport has almost no integrity or legitimacy as a result.
That said, I think he's understating the quality of the UFC's fighters in practice. And overstating the fairness of the Boxing system in comparison.
My point is that they're not the toughest fighters on the planet.you still have to win fights against the toughest fighters on the planet.
CM Punk was never really an athlete like some of the other guys (and certainly isn't a drug taker), and now he's 37. he's gonna get killed but hey he was totally over wrestling, he enjoys the product and wanted to do it, and UFC gave him the opportunity for whatever reason.
lol i'm not sure what this has to do with anythingAlso, Punk is straight-edge, he isn't taking roids.
I know guys have said stuff like that before, but I believe him. Punk's not going to take roids, and the point remains, even if he did they're not going to lead him to making the giant leaps in technique he's going to have to make to become competitive.“I don’t think it’s a secret [that] I’m straight edge. I have been, my entire life. I think if you use drugs and you’re a professional athlete, you’re a ***** … I just really feel that, I know everybody wants that competitive edge and they want to be better and stuff like that, but at the end of the day, you’ve gotta look at yourself in the mirror. I don’t know how some of these guys are doing that and still being proud of who they are.
“The flip side of that is, the supplement **** scares the **** out of me, because hey, who knows? There’s a dozen guys saying they had a tainted supplement. Maybe one of [them is telling the truth]. I don’t f*ckin’ know. But you know what I do? I just don’t take supplements.
“It is what it is. Don’t do drugs.”