His name's been sadly tarnished since then, but Vincent was one of the best I've seen in NZ colours.NZ - Guptill, Harris, Williamson, Watling (pre keeper days)
Yeah, that's a good shout too - McCullum probably deserves to be listed also.His name's been sadly tarnished since then, but Vincent was one of the best I've seen in NZ colours.
He wasYeah, that's a good shout too - McCullum probably deserves to be listed also.
This reminds me, wasn't Kapil Dev a great outfielder too?From India, our Lord and Savior AA had an absolutely outstanding arm from the deep. I would say circa 98-2002 or so, his was as good as any in world cricket. Was pretty quick across the turf too.
Someone who played even fewer Tests than Kaif was Ramnath Parkar, who some old Mumbaikars reckon was unequalled, before or since, when fielding at cover point. I once spent a day at the Wankhede Stadium watching Parkar unfold his skills in a Ranji Trophy match. Cover point is a key position especially for left-arm spinners, and I marvelled as Padmakar Shivalkar bowled, over after over, and Parkar anticipated the drives and cuts to his left and his right, picking up the ball one-handed and throwing it fast and flat to the wicketkeeper.
Azhar was probably the best allround Indian fielder I've seen in my lifetime.India - Solkar, Azhar, peak Yuvi, peak Kaif, Raina, Nohit, Jadeja
We've had some great slippers - Dravid, Laxman, Sehwag.
Yea both Jadejas are/were gun outfielders. I remember Ajay being good for his time; the Indian team back then was quite sloppy. He wouldn't seem so great today.Azhar was probably the best allround Indian fielder I've seen in my lifetime.
Sir Jadeja runs him close though (Ajay Jadeja was also quite good). Though Jaddu does have a habit of dropping a few in the slips.
This reminds me, wasn't Kapil Dev a great outfielder too?
I actually found a nice article on Cricinfo about this topic:
Ramachandra Guha: Memories of some great Indian fielders down the years | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
Learnt something new:
The interesting thing is that he really wasn't a great fieldsman ordinarily. He certainly wasn't terrible, but was just there or thereabouts in terms of the NZ'ders. Which of course made that catch, which I still maintain is the best I've seen all the more remarkable.Also, for NZ:
Sinclair was pretty good.
In his time, NZ had some of the best fielders in the world playing for them. Almost every one was superb in the field, which might have made him look average. Those were the days when India had trouble rotating the strike in ODIs against NZ because the ball couldn't get past the ring no matter how decent the placement was.The interesting thing is that he really wasn't a great fieldsman ordinarily. He certainly wasn't terrible, but was just there or thereabouts in terms of the NZ'ders. Which of course made that catch, which I still maintain is the best I've seen all the more remarkable.