luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
salmonsteds said:Yes. Everybody. Even Bob in his pink shirt.
salmonsteds said:Yes. Everybody. Even Bob in his pink shirt.
I thought he took it quite well. The first run he made after Australia after that run had the crowd cheering and AA smiling like the young boy that he is.SJS said:That kind of a run from someone who isnt a total wreck with the bat has to do a bit with dastardly bad luck. Later as it started piling up it would have affected him mentally. What with crowds chanting Bombay Duck or whatever they did. It must have been terrible and though a genius, our Ajit is human after all...or is he ?
Never underestimate the almighty!Hit4Six said:5 wickets for ajit and a man of the man award
But he bowled them to victory at Adelaide...Pratyush said:On how this five-for compares with his 6 for 42 against Australia
I'd rate this higher than my career-best (6-42) against Australia in Melbourne last year, because this has come in a winning cause. It won us the match, and we won the series as well today. Nothing can be more satisfying.
Different match. The 6-42 he is talking about was during a ODI in Melbourne (on the same tour), not the six-for in the Adelaide Test.vic_orthdox said:But he bowled them to victory at Adelaide...
Glad to see the President has graced this threadmarc71178 said:Never underestimate the almighty!
Ah, that's right! LOL - probably should have noticed when he said "Melbourne"Adamc said:Different match. The 6-42 he is talking about was during a ODI in Melbourne (on the same tour), not the six-for in the Adelaide Test.
Yeah he was even on a hat-trick in that game. I was thereAdamc said:Different match. The 6-42 he is talking about was during a ODI in Melbourne (on the same tour), not the six-for in the Adelaide Test.
You may be the Lord of Darkness but surely even you could see the light behind this ??lord_of_darkness said:Ajit Agarkar Great ?.,. naw Lmao..
what hes doing so far is pretty fine though.. but hes not someone to rely on!
225 wickets in 144 matches at an average of about 27...not bad,right?And for an Indian pacer,great!lord_of_darkness said:Ajit Agarkar Great ?.,. naw Lmao..
what hes doing so far is pretty fine though.. but hes not someone to rely on!
How could AA strafe with those ears????? He'd get noticed much too easilyajaagarkarajaaja said:Ajit Agarkar would have been a much better choice to play the role of James Bond 007 than the English actor Danial craig (nicknamed Potato-head)
Still better than the Potato-head who is getting bald, is short and is a bit ugly.King_Ponting said:How could AA strafe with those ears????? He'd get noticed much too easily