I would had gone with anyone DM among Busquets, Keane, Viera and Seedorf; but as a CB; surely Ramos>Cannavaro?Best XI since about the mid to late 90s
Buffon
Maldini
Nesta
Cannavaro
Lahm
Keane
Xavi
Zidane
Messi
Ronaldo
Ronaldo
DM the trickiest choice there. I could have picked any of about half a dozen players there and it wouldn't have felt wrong.
My dislike of Ramos probably colouring my thoughts there I'll admit.I would had gone with anyone DM among Busquets, Keane, Viera and Seedorf; but as a CB; surely Ramos>Cannavaro?
Ramos admittedly isn't the most likable fellow; but he is, imo, a Top 10 CB of all time; and I don't think Cannavaro is in my Top 25.My dislike of Ramos probably colouring my thoughts there I'll admit.
Thuram was defensively more stern and have the physical advantage, but imo, Lahm was technically superior, more Swift at creating attacks and was an underrated genius. Anyways, not much between them; and also Cafu. Henry isn't really in the conversation when you have Messi, and a pair of Ronaldo's; 3 Top 10 footballers of all time; and no way Lizarazu have a claim ahead of Maldini. Desailly is the great shout alongside Thuram and Viera; but just falls short to Ramos and Nesta.Feels like the France turn of the Century side has been completely overlooked here bar Zidane. Desailly, Thuram, Lizarazu and Henry surely have to be in the discussions.
Was Lahm better than his Bayern predecessor?
Massively disagree. Pre injury R9 is close to Pele imo.Henry v R9 is a lot closer than is often made out, imo.
Still earnt me a fortune as the top goalscorer in 2002.Massively disagree. Pre injury R9 is close to Pele imo.
If goals in Spain are easier, then they're easily tougher in Italy. Pre injury R9 was a beast.Still earnt me a fortune as the top goalscorer in 2002.
Slightly hard to equate as somewhat different players, but as a standalone goalscorer, Ronaldo's record is better (even if goals in Spain are somewhat easier to come by).
He actually has fewer (club) career goals than Henry, just ftr.Still earnt me a fortune as the top goalscorer in 2002.
Slightly hard to equate as somewhat different players, but as a standalone goalscorer, Ronaldo's record is better (even if goals in Spain are somewhat easier to come by).
290 in 600 vs 280 in 384..... Henry's France performances makes this whole debate quite pointless. R9 is Top 10 AT, Henry isn't cracking anywhere in Top 50.He actually has fewer (club) career goals than Henry, just ftr.
Would personally have Zola above Ferdinand. Tempted by the idea of Radebe above Hyppia too.A premier league xi who have never won the pl?
Not including current players.
Given
Harte
Hyppia
Desailly
Petrescu
Bale
Gerrard
Alonso
Ginola
Le tissier
Ferdinand
Zola and Klinsmann unlucky to miss out
He didn't...Zola and le tiss was 50/50 for me.
Suarez still playing?
If torres didn't win the pl at Chelsea then yep I'd definitely have him over Ferdinand.