the big bambino
Cricketer Of The Year
All good calls. I kept my side to players I’ve seen (play live) an old timey XI would include Larwood and possibly Ted Mac, Tate and Verity. Batsmen could include May, Jackson and Trumper. Kippax?
Both FTW.I would perhaps have Shaun Pollock in place of Faulkner, harsh as that may be on the latter.
BTW, what does CW think about Greame Smith vs. Bruce Mitchell? I often tend to pick the latter.
Smith scored his runs in a very easy era, but had a habit of making very valuable runs. Very little in it. When that happens with a modern player and a pre WW2 I tend to default to the modern player because they are more of a known entity. I'm usually picking smith here for the same reason I'm only picking Hammond on occasion rather than every time I make a test 11.BTW, what does CW think about Greame Smith vs. Bruce Mitchell? I often tend to pick the latter.
It is actually.Not the best XI from SA though.
No it isn’t. Pollock wasn’t a better player than Procter because Pollock happened to play more tests due to political situations.It is actually.
I guess an all time England XI can benefit from having Wisden and Bedlam; but they didn't play test cricket. Barry Richards played 4 matches, Procter 7. Not good enough for selection. They would be among my top 3 choices for an all time First Class XI from South Africa, though.
I didnt say that. it is the best south african test xi coz it consists of players who played (enough) test cricket for SA. There is always a best first class x i for those who were great at that level. We dont have enough info to assume procter and co would have been test champs in the long run.No it isn’t. Pollock wasn’t a better player than Procter because Pollock happened to play more tests due to political situations.
That's fine if it's the criteria you want to use. Most people just make a SA al time XI. Mostly based on tests, but not necessarily. For instance, when cricinfo did the all time XIs a few years back they included all three of Richards, G.Pollock and Procter.I didnt say that. it is the best south african test xi coz it consists of players who played (enough) test cricket for SA. There is always a best first class x i for those who were great at that level. We dont have enough info to assume procter and co would have been test champs in the long run.
I am saying Pollock is a test cricketer. Procter isn't. Seven swallows don't make a spring.
of course I have. he was simply awesome. and he was a superstar when i was a kid in the 70s and 80s, always compared favorably with the four great all-rounders dominating world cricket. but i didnt see him play enough test cricket (it wasnt his fault; but he didn't any which way) for me to select him when i know for sure shaun pollock had a stellar test career. you can't punish such a champion like shaun just because we have romantic notions of Procter ruling the world of test cricket when in reality he played only 7 paltry games.Honestly, there's an overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest Procter would have been a Test ATG. If you're not convinced by his stats then defs check out some footage of him on YouTube!
Excellent. Might be good for balance to have Faulkner instead of one of O'Reilly/Barnes.All-time XI of champs who played less than 30 tests
Barry Richards
Bill Ponsford
G. Headley
G.A. Pollock
Eddie Paynter
Mike Procter
Gerry Alexander +*
Peter Pollock
Colin Croft
Tiger O'Reilley
Syd Barnes
12th man: Ryan Harris