• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Ponting’s fielding ability shouldn’t be underestimated either.

Having Ponting, Viv and Symonds patrolling the inner ring would be immense.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Symonds would be a great choice for #7 in am ATG side. Only Klusener would be competition really. I'd probably pick Symonds in the subcontinent and Klusener outside (or at least in Australia).
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Symonds would be a great choice for #7 in am ATG side. Only Klusener would be competition really. I'd probably pick Symonds in the subcontinent and Klusener outside (or at least in Australia).
He really wouldn't. Nowhere near good enough with the ball to justify a spot as an all rounder which number 7 demands.
 

Austerlitz

U19 Debutant
ATG ODI XI batting order comes down to one question - where are we playing?

In the SC:
Jayasuria
Tendulkar
Richards
Kohli
ABDV
Dhoni

Outside the SC:
Gilchrist
Tendulkar
Ponting
Richards
ABDV
Bevan

IMO of course.

I think you should go with Jaya/Dhoni or Gilchrist/Bevan. The former has a decent bowler and the latter has better batting outside the subcontinent.

Ponting vs Kholi is a tough one though. Ponting was so very excellent for so many years and lead his team to two world cup wins. So he gets the nod outside the SC. Kholi's subcontinent record is just too immense to ignore.
Agree with this.
In SC -

Jayasuriya
Tendulkar
Richards
Kohli
ABDV
Kallis
Dhoni
Garner
Akram
Murali
Warne

Outside SC -

Gilchrist
Tendulkar
Ponting
Richards
Kohli(because kohli can be as good/almost as good a chaser as bevan while also being a main bat)
Kallis
ABDV
Warne
Garner
Mcgrath
Akram
 
Last edited:

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He really wouldn't. Nowhere near good enough with the ball to justify a spot as an all rounder which number 7 demands.
Except that with Jayasuria in the team he'd be the 6th bowler, who would need to get through 5 overs max.

He's one of the best hitters the ODI game has seen and was a key part of Australia's world cup victories with the bat.

In addition to this he was one of the best fielders of all time and that's one of the most underrated skills in ODI cricket.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If you want an all rounder for their bowling you're better off with Pollock. Klusener was massive with the bat and very good with the ball.

Watson would be a good choice if you wanted a fast bowling batting all rounder. Certainly better than Kallis in the format.
 

Austerlitz

U19 Debutant
If you want an all rounder for their bowling you're better off with Pollock. Klusener was massive with the bat and very good with the ball.

Watson would be a good choice if you wanted a fast bowling batting all rounder. Certainly better than Kallis in the format.
Watson in a ATG team.:D
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Watson has better stats than Jayasuria. He averaged 40@90 with the bat and 32 going <5 rpo with the ball. Jayasuria averaged 32@91 with the bat and 36 going at 4.8 rpo with the ball. Jaya had the longevity but an argument could be made that Watson could open with Tendulkar in an AT XI.

Australia probably has an AT XI lineup of:

Watson
Gilchrist
Ponting
Bevan
Chappell G
Hussey
Symonds
Warne
Starc (Lee if you think Starc hasn't done enough)
Lillee
McGrath
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
Watson has better stats than Jayasuria. He averaged 40@90 with the bat and 32 going <5 rpo with the ball. Jayasuria averaged 32@91 with the bat and 36 going at 4.8 rpo with the ball. Jaya had the longevity but an argument could be made that Watson could open with Tendulkar in an AT XI.

Australia probably has an AT XI lineup of:

Watson
Gilchrist
Ponting
Bevan
Chappell G
Hussey
Symonds
Warne
Starc (Lee if you think Starc hasn't done enough)
Lillee
McGrath
Dean Jones and Bracken probably deserve consideration. I reckon Mark Waugh makes the selection of Watson a bit tricky in an ATG Australian ODI team.

I'd definitely pick Jayasuriya as an opener over Watson in a world XI. He wasn't always consistent, but not many dominated bowlers like he did when he was in the mood. I also feel he was a better bowler in this format than Watson. Having said that, I'm more likely to just pick Gilchrist and Tendulkar in a world XI if it was up to me.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Dean Jones and Bracken probably deserve consideration. I reckon Mark Waugh makes the selection of Watson a bit tricky in an ATG Australian ODI team.

I'd definitely pick Jayasuriya as an opener over Watson in a world XI. He wasn't always consistent, but not many dominated bowlers like he did when he was in the mood. I also feel he was a better bowler in this format than Watson. Having said that, I'm more likely to just pick Gilchrist and Tendulkar in a world XI if it was up to me.
I just don't see the need for Gilchrist when Dhoni is around. Unless you are making a case for Dhoni not belonging to an AT World XI
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Yep. Dhoni is really not good enough to be in an AT XI outside Asia. At least, not when Gilchrist is the competition.
really? off the top of my head i can't remember Dhoni being bad in any country other than SA. Where exactly other than maybe Aus and SA would you consider Gilchrist better than Dhoni?
 

Top