• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Ashes

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Gah, just realised I'd better take out Saj Mahmood and Read after Fletcher's comments. In come Clark and Jones.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
off stump said:
will the people who picked watson get the replacement automaticly :blink:
Nope, it's part of the game to pick players who will actually play in the series.

Of course, if you think Watto'll recover and play the last four Tests, it might still be good to have him there.
 

pug20g

Cricket Spectator
Anderson misses out on wicket points

Hi,

I have just noticed that Anderson didn't get any points for his wicket for Michael Clarke in the 1st Innings.

MJ Clarke c Strauss b Anderson

Strauss got the points for the catch but Anderson seemed to have missed out. Could this be looked into? Preferably before the 1st test ends (and teams could potentailly be changed).

Thanks
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
pug20g said:
Hi,

I have just noticed that Anderson didn't get any points for his wicket for Michael Clarke in the 1st Innings.

MJ Clarke c Strauss b Anderson

Strauss got the points for the catch but Anderson seemed to have missed out. Could this be looked into? Preferably before the 1st test ends (and teams could potentailly be changed).

Thanks
If a bowler concedes over 125 runs in an innings he loses five points, so Jimmy's 1/141 cancelled itself out.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not going too well in the bowling department, with only Clark going well, while Lee and Anderson were fairly ordinary, and Monty didn't even play. At least I've got Ponting, Collingwood, Pietersen and Bell for the batting.
 

pug20g

Cricket Spectator
BoyBrumby said:
If a bowler concedes over 125 runs in an innings he loses five points, so Jimmy's 1/141 cancelled itself out.
Hi BB,

Thanks for clearing that up. I seem to recall previously the whole result (ie a +5 for the wicket and a -5 for the runs) used to be put down but it seems it is just the net result now on. I guess it makes it tidier but player's "transactions" gets lost in it.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Inzi_mam said:
Adam Gilchrist took 4 catches in 2nd inning.. and you forgot to add that...
Rich missed all the fielding pointsfrom the 2nd Innings. This has now been corrected.
 
india tour to south africa

Now a day’s Indian cricket team has gone to South Africa for mtn international series, if we look after at pervious record Indian never won series against South Africa. In 1992-93 when Indian has gone to South Africa and come back without trophy.
If we see the performance of previous matches which are already played, we get the condition are same as 1992-93 condition.
.
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
andyc said:
Not going too well in the bowling department, with only Clark going well, while Lee and Anderson were fairly ordinary, and Monty didn't even play. At least I've got Ponting, Collingwood, Pietersen and Bell for the batting.
:cool:
 

dileep.vaka

Cricket Spectator
Shane Watson is not playing.In allrounder list players are flintoff,watson. So we have to select only flintoff in that slot. Can you add any other allrounder in that list.
 
Last edited:

Top