subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Yeah but there wasn't a Warne before WarneThat wasn't one, it was two
Yeah but there wasn't a Warne before WarneThat wasn't one, it was two
They're not really at the Warne/Murali level of greatness as spinners. But Jadeja is making a distinctive mark as a spin bowling all rounder. We haven't had too many of those.What’s even crazier is that we have two spinners like Ashwin and Jadeja now
Before him was Ashwin and Shaqib.They're not really at the Warne/Murali level of greatness as spinners. But Jadeja is making a distinctive mark as a spin bowling all rounder. We haven't had too many of those.
While I agree Imran was the best, is it really that clear cut over Hadlee.I'll go Tendulkar / Lara as the closest.
The all-rounders are the most straightforward. Imran stands head and shoulders above as an all-rounder.
That's why I say "as all-rounders". As bowlers, and overall cricketers it could be closer ( Hadlee edges as a bowler ).While I agree Imran was the best, is it really that clear cut over Hadlee.
They are primarily bowlers and Hadlee is stronger there. That counts for something?
I do think it is close between them. If you add captaincy, then not so much.While I agree Imran was the best, is it really that clear cut over Hadlee.
They are primarily bowlers and Hadlee is stronger there. That counts for something?
I’ll still take Laker > Verity personally but thats just me.O’Reilly, Grimmett/ Verity would be more than acceptable top 3 ranking of Spinners before Warne/ Murali arrived. Not any sort of rivalry as Tiger was clearly better. But incredible for probably the 3 greatest spinners of over first 100 years to arrive at same time.
I mean, that was preceeded by Imran/Hadlee/Marshall, etc. so hardly amazing.McGrath/Ambrose/Akram/Donald
They probably peaked at different times tho
Think Lara over Tendulkar is outside the box. Hadlee or Botham over Imran is outside the box. Not sure I'd say Murali over Warne (or vice versa) is outside the box. Warne's bigger reputation is partially objective but also partially subjective.Why? Don't most consider Warne better?
Lara over Tendulkar isn't out of the box at all, it's a fair minority. Same with Murali over Warne I guess.Think Lara over Tendulkar is outside the box. Hadlee or Botham over Imran is outside the box. Not sure I'd say Murali over Warne (or vice versa) is outside the box. Warne's bigger reputation is partially objective but also partially subjective.
There are people who thought Imran was > Marshall/Hadlee as bowlers overall???I mean, that was preceeded by Imran/Hadlee/Marshall, etc. so hardly amazing.
Out of the box doesn't necessarily mean unfair.Lara over Tendulkar isn't out of the box at all, it's a fair minority. Same with Murali over Warne I guess.
Saying that there are plenty of contemporaries who rate Lara ahead.Out of the box doesn't necessarily mean unfair.