TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
You can try and justify the behaviour in the examples I gave all you want, that's fine, but it wasn't really the crux of my point. I was just pointing out that the real definition "selfishness" being examined in this context is not the one that you are bringing up, IMO.I don’t know if Dhoni bats for his average. I truly don’t.
For a once great cricketing nation deprived of simple pleasures Lara’s 400 was something they could celebrate and that could inspire the next generation (it probably did, we don’t know) of West Indians: also it ensured that his team wouldn’t lose the test which was a big deal for that bunch.
Even if we know for sure that Dhoni bats for his average and a once in a century batting achievement is less important to a cricketing culture than a shot at winning a match with a weak bowling attack... I don’t know if Tendulkar hurt his team’s chances in pursuit of personal glory. His single minded occupation of scoring runs was comparable to Hadlee’s relentless search for bowling records. Both served their teams as generously as Richards and Warne served theirs. Don’t know why trying to maximise one’s own gifts is bad for the team...
Specifically the type of selfishness relevant to the discussion is that which directly disadvantages your team, which is mutually exclusive to the context which you are bringing it up in (ie. can help the team).