English pitches are actually pretty flat. What you have is atmospheric conditions.I am not so sure about this. Remember half our matches are in England where 45 is a superb average. We dont have the flat tracks to inflat the averages. Sure it would make it easier but 6 batmen averaging 45 would be more than enough with a keeper averaging 40 and 8/9 averaging 25. Thats average totals of 360+. More than enough to win every Test if our bowlers average sub 30.
They have a win % of 13 in ODIs too in recent times if whatever rankings comes on Ten Sports is to be trusted.Haha, after seeing Pakistan in the most recent 2 tests, the win over Australia is just such an anomaly. I still think it may never have happened and this was all a dream.
Must say, I raised a laugh at this. You should be deported IMO.Gonna have to do better than beating minnows like Bangladesh, Pakistan and Australia to convince me you'll get to number one.
Well current averages suggest the strongest England batting line-up for a very long time, if not close to best averages ever with the # 7-9 averaging 96.....Batsmen too.
Can't see in this age a no.1 team dominating without a single batsman having a 50+ avg (ok min. innings criteria etc)
Yep, it is perhaps the strongest english batting lineup, but it is still behind SL, Ind, SA and arguably behind Aus as well as far as batting prowess is concerned.Well current averages suggest the strongest England batting line-up for a very long time, if not close to best averages ever with the # 7-9 averaging 96.....
Morgan 57.00
Trott 50.11
Pietersen 48.96
Collingwood 43.57
Strauss 43.45
Cook 43.20
Prior 42.14
Swann 28.86
Broad 24.94
Do you really think he'll be playing cricket at that age?By the time we reach number one, KP will be back above fifty
GIMH's level of optimisn reaching new heights!Do you really think he'll be playing cricket at that age?