• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sydney Barnes vs Imran Khan

Who is the better test bowler?


  • Total voters
    25

Migara

International Coach
Yep, not possible by anyone except Murali, arguably Hayden too.....
Murali got drift only he was bowling at his absolute best. When you see him getting it, you know he will end up with a bag. In Colombo against India he got a 8 for with drift and dip, and another in England. There was not much instances I can remember he drifted and dipped like a proper finger spinner in other times.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Did Barnes bowl off breaks? As far as I know off spinners get away drift.
He bowled cutters, which are essentially fast offbreaks or legbreaks.

You can definitely get drift with that. Mustafizur Rahman comes to mind as an example of a bowler who consistently does that.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Swing requires a stabilized, upright seam, with an axis of revolution pointing across the width of the pitch. Spin requires an axis of revolution pointing across the length of the pitch. They're incompatible within the same delivery.

Whereas drift and spin happen in the same delivery all the time. The language used to describe these phenomenon was less precise during Barnes' time, so this explanation makes more sense to me, than Barnes breaking physics.
 

Migara

International Coach
Swing requires a stabilized, upright seam, with an axis of revolution pointing across the width of the pitch. Spin requires an axis of revolution pointing across the length of the pitch. They're incompatible within the same delivery.

Whereas drift and spin happen in the same delivery all the time. The language used to describe these phenomenon was less precise during Barnes' time, so this explanation makes more sense to me, than Barnes breaking physics.
Swing needs backward spin to stabilize the seam, and this will push the ball little further than expected. Spin needs forward spin which makes ball to drop a little shorter than expected (dip). So awing and spin cannot occur together.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Swing needs backward spin to stabilize the seam, and this will push the ball little further than expected. Spin needs forward spin which makes ball to drop a little shorter than expected (dip). So awing and spin cannot occur together.
What about swerve
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
What about swerve
Swerve just another name for drift, innit.

I'd say any air movement that comes from rotation could be called that, because they all just use the magnus effect and will move the ball a different way depending on which way the ball is rotating.

In contrast swing is always just due to difference in airflow between two sides of the ball on opposite sides of the seam, and requires the seam orientation to remain upright.
 

reyrey

U19 Captain
Heard Barnes used to bowl a delivery that used to swing out and spin in at the same time.
A flipper might technically be able to do this. Bowling it fast enough to swing and then grip on the pitch to turn just seems highly improbable though.
 

sayon basak

International Debutant
A flipper might technically be able to do this. Bowling it fast enough to swing and then grip on the pitch to turn just seems highly improbable though.
Yeah, as flipper has back spin to it, it might swing I guess if bowled fast enough. But flipper, if spins, spins away from the batsman. And I think grimmett was the first bowler to actually bowl the flipper.
 

Top