• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sub cont sides have been soft

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
SL would have had an easier route if they had played SA in the semi, who would have choked and let them through in easier fashion :ph34r:
 

smash84

The Tiger King
A Pakistan that got hammered by New Zealand.

Easiest route my ass.
tbf Pakistan should not have gotten hammered by NZ.

Khatmal literally handed the match to the NZs on a platter.

Although Taylor did play a great innings towards the end of NZ innings but it should not have beem
 

StumpMic

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
SL has had one of the least difficult routes ever to the finals. Thoughts?
Well people will say things like these. But a team that makes the finals twice in two tournaments isn't there because they got lucky or had it easy. SL earned their place in the finals.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
SL have played awesome cricket to make the finals.. see them as the more balanced team than India. But this Indian side has proven itself capable of overcoming some handicaps, so we shall see.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah, this. Been thoroughly impressed post-group stages at the way the Indians have regrouped and stuck to their guns without being at their best. You only have to be good enough.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Never claimed SL aren't a good side or didn't play well etc etc. Just that they've had it relatively easier compared to most teams reaching finals in WCs.
 

Top