10 minutes of Beethoven is better than a lifetime of Rap and R&B drivel (OK pompous and unrepresentative example ... but what the hey ... the point is madeMr Mxyzptlk said:They say...
"Hooper bats like a virtuoso... and then he gets out."
I agree on both counts - Mark Waugh was wonderful to watch, but in naming this poll 'of all time' and then just about the only player from pre-1980 to be included is Geoff Boycott strikes me as a total wind-up.Tim said:Martin Crowe was stylish also.
But I must say Mark Waugh played some teriffic cover drives.
Text book is not necessarily beautiful though. But he must have been a joy to beholdTim said:What about Bradman, he was supposedly textbook material..but I guess unless you've gone through the archives nobody can really tell.
I think this list should have read: Most Stylish batsmen over the last 10 years. Presumably not many on this forum would have seen the likes of Gower, Gavaskar etc bat too often.
YEs Azza was great , cant beleive I forgot him & Hooper , but he's a cheating bastard so it kind of erases all the positive memories of him , as for Boycott on the rare occasions he actually played a shot he was quite elegantTim said:Azza, yes he was another very stylish batsman, but he pressed the self destruct button.
Ahem....iamdavid said:YEs Azza was great , cant beleive I forgot him & Hooper , but he's a cheating bastard so it kind of erases all the positive memories of him , as for Boycott on the rare occasions he actually played a shot he was quite elegant
Even ChanderpaulroyGilchrist said:Heck to me all left handers look stylish![]()
Fair comment, but if my objection to the basic perception that all cricketers before 1980 were not stylish owing to their exclusion from the list is a 'rant' as opposed to a 'justifiable comment', then I will continue labouring the point that an 18-20 year-old should recognise the difference between 'all-time' and 'whom I have seen'.PY said:As much as I understand your rant Eddie, people can only go on what they have said and as the average age of the people who have replied so far is about 18-20, I wouldn't expect people to say anything other than a modern era player.
True (if it didn't have 'other' I would have done so too) - doesn't change a thing (because I voted for Graeme Pollock) IMO. No thought or no knowledge gone into it if it was an all-time list (and remember Gower was playing test cricket until 1992 first-class cricket as recently as 1993.gibbsnsmith said:David Gower in that list...