Yes i agree with your overview but what do you set batting or bowling to ? ie set batting to 1 and maybe they dont get out and scores runs - set them to 9 and maybe they get out but have scored 20 odd off 6 balls before doing so - ditto your bowling set it at 9 and they may get hit for runs but on the other hand they could bowl out the opposition in a flash!haven't played yet, both ZCC and FHK have byes in the crazy lose round. Might try a ZCC vs FHK crazy lose friendly on Thursday to try. I think the strategy would be to figure out 50 overs of crap bowling (with the weakest possible batting to go with it), then the weakest batting around it, worst keeper, and worst captain out of the 11.
Im playing the procrastinators - the XPV shows us having inferior bowling to them but my tail end batting is way to strong at 61k - I will be batting 2nd so my only hope is my rubbish top order stays in at scores a run an over or less - difficult overall though as you seem to pick up 2 RPO from wides ad no balls! with Procrastinators already 7 down and just 120 on the board its not looking promising!...why did i fire all those useless Bangladeshi youth pulls ?!?!?AXI look like getting 230-2 in our crazy lose game rn. I've adopted the Ashgrove strategy of bowling 0/1 skill bowlers for the first 30 overs in the hope of the wide every third ball, but battingwise I lack the right players for this (MAS of 1, everyone on 1 aggression)! No hyper**** players sadly. Chris Waters (8/5/3 batting) currently 40* (112).
yea IDK. I'm leaning towards 9 for those with poor attack skill and 1 for those with poor defense skill, or for really good bats with a low MAS so they plod along in the tail. Or maybe 9 for the good bats in the tail and hope they slog themselves out.Yes i agree with your overview but what do you set batting or bowling to ? ie set batting to 1 and maybe they dont get out and scores runs - set them to 9 and maybe they get out but have scored 20 odd off 6 balls before doing so - ditto your bowling set it at 9 and they may get hit for runs but on the other hand they could bowl out the opposition in a flash!
That partnership took the game away from GG.The Shah-boss with another ton, gets ZCC over the line quite comfortably in the end.
View attachment 34133
No one's crossed 3 figures more in the history of the club.
Lot of modern names on that list - we did not play as many friendlies in the pre-CWC era. But even filtering for just Competitive games, the Shah-boss is right up there:
View attachment 34134
Yep the search function can be limited by member.Is there an easy way i can search for my own posts on our forum? I want to remind myself of the ridiculous goals I set without wading through hundreds of pages! thanks all
Not how I was envisioning he be a gun opener, but ! nonetheless. (How I play my pinch-hitter is 9 aggression. Shots played ~ 20% push, 40% attack, and 40% slog.)Pretty comprehensive T20 win against Jura there. Much needed as prior to it we were both in the bottom two and winless.
Very measured innings from Hlengwa. Go figure.
Yes you really dismantled our batting- I think I may have been overaggressive with my orders (and I am not going to be too hard on myself for that as conditions were middling and it is a T20 game) and then once the wickets start to fall the innings is in a constant state of retrenchment - but kudos to the AA as they never allowed the retrenchment to take place and we tumbled away - it will be tough to fight back from this in the league, but i won't give up yet - i don't think the team is significantly inferior to the teams just above it- so the winds may turn but a 5 point loss against potential relegation contenders is always a big hit as i can only realistically expect (at best!) a 4-1 win in the return- well playedPretty comprehensive T20 win against Jura there. Much needed as prior to it we were both in the bottom two and winless.
Very measured innings from Hlengwa. Go figure.
Thank you - very useful!Yep the search function can be limited by member.
Just lost my game, thankfully. It's tough this losing, but go with 1 aggression imo