Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
I never said he was or would be.marc71178 said:But he's not, and at 37 will not be worth selection.
I disputed that he isn't better than any batsmen in the current England line-up.
I never said he was or would be.marc71178 said:But he's not, and at 37 will not be worth selection.
Astle, McMillan and Fleming may do, but there are a whole host of others whose ability is, in my view and mostly suggested by their records, inferior to his.Rik said:Most of those "excuses" have good records, certainly more impressive than Blewett in either discipline.
Comparative Purple Patch?Richard said:As with the Harmison case, the substandardness of others and a comparative purple-patch doesn't make-up for the substandardness of one.
Well, Adam Hollioake's going to retire so I can't mention him. Why not:marc71178 said:If he's so substandard, who would you put in ahead of him (and you'll need 2 or 3 names since if he's substandard, so are others)
I went for players who have shown ability in the OD game. I don't see what the point of picking someone who is great at 4D but useless in OD, unless the person in question had shown ability in both forms. OD cricket is very different to 4D, requires very different skills, which is perfectly illustrated in the difference between Vaughan's Test and ODI career records.Craig said:Pretty big list there Rik.
Kenway seems to better in the 1d game and then in 4d cricket. Troughton would of been better off picked for Tests, but lost confidence after being picked in the wrong game. But Rikki isnt up to standard in both forms of the game at international level YET.