Strawberry blonde = ranga...Naturally dirty blonde.
Stop dwelling on the hair colour in the photo and start dwelling on how pretty Stuart Broad is. The pedantry of it all...
Broad certainly is more chiselled than Yuvraj "Jiggly Belly" Singh.Broad chiselled?
Well you ARE wrong. Check it up on the net - you'l find pretty much every source saying he's 5' 11". Don't pull stats outta your ass, at least.Yuvraj is 6 feet one if am not wrong.
Oh, absolutely. What makes you think looking like Prince Charming from Shrek is a bad thing?And FFS people - you'd all be thanking your respective deities every day if any of you looked like Broad or were with a woman like ERW. Get real guys!
I reckon we'd have a decent face off actually, blonde highlight to blonde highlight...Anderson will only bowl well consistently when he goes bald and doesn't have to worry about his doYeah, 'cos our team is packed full of guys with bleached hair & wanky, mulletty, spikey "dos". Oh, no, actually, that's yours.
He's wearing an English shirt...I never want to look like thatAnd FFS people - you'd all be thanking your respective deities every day if any of you looked like Broad or were with a woman like ERW. Get real guys!
I shudder to think of what you must look like if you aspire to match Broad for looks.And FFS people - you'd all be thanking your respective deities every day if any of you looked like Broad or were with a woman like ERW. Get real guys!
Not really fair, one of the things going for him IMO, is his action. He doesn't look awkward when he bowls, and he definately gets the most out of his height at the point of delivery.I don't think its massively important what he looks like. More what he bowls like, and IMO thats not great, he's got a bit of a naf action doesn't really do alot, it looks quite manafactured.
So you think the selectors sit there before a test match and say '...Ooh that Ian Bell, he's got nice hair, we'll pick him over Owais Shah? Ok.'Since when aren't looks important in cricket? Get a clue about televised sport.
Was a heavily sarcastic comment, but for the record neither Bell nor Shah have particularly attractive hair.So you think the selectors sit there before a test match and say '...Ooh that Ian Bell, he's got nice hair, we'll pick him over Owais Shah? Ok.'
dwtanot really fair, one of the things going for him imo, is his action. He doesn't look awkward when he bowls, and he definately gets the most out of his height at the point of delivery.
Explain?dwta
I shudder to think what your definition of good-looking must be if you think Stuart Broad isn't by any measure.I shudder to think of what you must look like if you aspire to match Broad for looks.
Nah, Broad is fit for a chick.I shudder to think what your definition of good-looking must be if you think Stuart Broad isn't by any measure.