• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steven Smith vs Dale Steyn

Steven Smith vs Dale Steyn

  • Total voters
    23
T

Thala_0710

First Class Debutant
DrWolverine said:
Smith averaged 70+ for 4 consecutive years.

Sachin averaged 60+ for 5 consecutive years.

I understand what you are saying though.

Sachin never had the peak Steven whereas he did it at a lesser peak for more number of years.
Click to expand...
Sachin avged 60 from 1993-2011 though, which included both peaks and troughs. To do that for 18 years, is just mind boggling stuff
 
Johan

Johan

International Debutant
DrWolverine said:
If longevity is really important, Viv Richards isn’t comparable to Sachin Tendulkar. His record is similar to Ken Barrington(1959-1968).

Viv’s peak was between 1976-1988 and he barely played Test cricket in 1977, 1978 and 1979.

Viv : 92 Tests. 7091 runs. Avg of 55.40. 22 tons.
Ken : 82 Tests. 6806 runs. Avg of 58.6. 20 tons.

Sachin’s peak is unparalleled
1992-2011 :
172 Tests. 14622 runs. Avg of 57.57. 50 tons.
Click to expand...
you do realise the whole reason Sachin wins over Viv is longetivity right? also, Viv's peak was 76-81, where he had ATG tours in England/Australia and Pakistan against great bowlers. in 1984 he had an eye surgery that messed with his batting IE reflexes but he was still the best bar maybe Border.

also, Barrington isn't top 15
 
Last edited:
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
DrWolverine said:
If longevity is really important, Viv Richards isn’t comparable to Sachin Tendulkar. His record is similar to Ken Barrington(1959-1968).

Viv’s peak was between 1976-1988 and he barely played Test cricket in 1977, 1978 and 1979.

Viv : 92 Tests. 7091 runs. Avg of 55.40. 22 tons.
Ken : 82 Tests. 6806 runs. Avg of 58.6. 20 tons.

Sachin’s peak is unparalleled
1992-2011 :
172 Tests. 14622 runs. Avg of 57.57. 50 tons.
Click to expand...
Wrong peak for Viv. Peak between 76 to 80/81 and averaged 70 plus.

His case is similar to Smith.
 
Johan

Johan

International Debutant
@DrWolverine just wondering, what's Sachin's 1992-2011 average without 2000s Zimbabwe and Bangladesh bashing? would be fair, considering Barrington got no real minnows to murder and Viv never got SL.
 
DrWolverine

DrWolverine

First Class Debutant
Viv’s peak is from 1976-1981?
The guy played just 9 Tests in 3 years.
5 Tests in 1977
2 Tests in 1978
2 Tests in 1979
 
Fanboy375

Fanboy375

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
OverratedSanity said:
Tendulkar didn't have as dominant a stretch of his career where he averaged 75-80 over the span of several years like Smith did. Also never had as many huge series where he picked off hundred after hundred like Smith in the ashes/India 2017.
Click to expand...
Mohammed Yousuf had better peak than Sachin in mid 2000s yet nobody compare with him.Yes I do think few years ago Smith when had better average is better than Sachin (if he bring his form back and play similar fashion for 3-4 years he will be above Sachin) but peak means nothing if you are inconsistent
 
Johan

Johan

International Debutant
Johan said:
@DrWolverine just wondering, what's Sachin's 1992-2011 average without 2000s Zimbabwe and Bangladesh bashing? would be fair, considering Barrington got no real minnows to murder and Viv never got SL.
Click to expand...
Looks like without 2000s Zimbabwe and Bangladesh minnow bashing, Sachin averaged 50.65, interesting.
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I don't pretend longevity is the overriding decisive factor.

The top tier each have their own plusses and minuses. Each is recognized as a top bat of their era. Each have impeccable stats with no real weaknesses.

Tendulkar: Longevity of worldclass performances over variety of attacks

Hobbs: Longevity of worldclass performances over variety of conditions

Sobers: 10 year absolute dominance

Viv: ATG Arguably greatest peak ever and ATG dominant series

Smith: ATG peak and ATG dominant series

For those who include Lara: Best in the zone player

Their weaknesses:

Tendulkar: Lack of dominant series

Hobbs: Unprofessional era

Sobers: A bit of a home basher

Viv: Lack of consistency outside peak

Smith: Overly friendly home conditions and lack of playing against ATG attacks

Lara: relatively poor against high pace and underwhelming away.
 
DrWolverine

DrWolverine

First Class Debutant
subshakerz said:
Wrong peak for Viv. Peak between 76 to 80/81 and averaged 70 plus. His case is similar to Smith.
Click to expand...
Viv : 1976-1981
Smith : 2014-2017
Sachin : 1997-2001

Viv : 35 Tests. 3500 runs. Avg of 68. 12 tons.

Smith : 44 Tests. 5004 runs. Avg of 75. 21 tons.

Sachin :43 Tests. 4313 runs. Avg of 66. 17 tons.

Sachin had another great peak as well(2007-2011)
51 Tests. 4698 runs. Avg of 59. 16 tons.
 
DrWolverine

DrWolverine

First Class Debutant
How is Viv the greatest peak ever? Smith had a better peak than him and Sachin had an equally great peak as well.
 
Johan

Johan

International Debutant
subshakerz said:
Why surprising, that coincided with his injury phase 2003 to 2006.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about career averages, 90s included his average away falls to 50.6 without minnow (2000s Ban and Zimbabwe) bashing, interesting as in that's quite a drop.
 
Coronis

Coronis

International Coach
I do find it a bit weird to say Sachin had a peak of 92-11 considering he had that whole slump for multiple years in the middle of that.

It would be like if Kohli suddenly went on a huge tear for 5 years and people started calling his peak from 2015 onwards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top