Himannv
Hall of Fame Member
Yet he expressed surprise at the outcome?To see who would win
Yet he expressed surprise at the outcome?To see who would win
Could have just asked him directly in the AMA thread.Tbf It's natural, he might've just thought Smudge would win based on him being a newer player and strike rate yada yada yada.
So you create a poll thinking "hah Player A is going to win this for sure because CW posters are poop" but when it doesn't pan out that way, you think "huh, CW posters are not poop after all? That can't be right!"Tbf It's natural, he might've just thought Smudge would win based on him being a newer player and strike rate yada yada yada.
tbf, I don't think Subs minds the result.So you create a poll thinking "hah Player A is going to win this for sure because CW posters are poop" but when it doesn't pan out that way, you think "huh, CW posters are not poop after all? That can't be right!"
Sounds more like self-validation than anything else.
No I thought Smith would edge it but just wanted to see how close it would be.So you create a poll thinking "hah Player A is going to win this for sure because CW posters are poop" but when it doesn't pan out that way, you think "huh, CW posters are not poop after all? That can't be right!"
Sounds more like self-validation than anything else.
Can you somehow prove that it's wrong to do so? That'd be cool.So you create a poll thinking "hah Player A is going to win this for sure because CW posters are poop" but when it doesn't pan out that way, you think "huh, CW posters are not poop after all? That can't be right!"
Sounds more like self-validation than anything else.
Why?Can you somehow prove that it's wrong to do so?
Just sayin'.Why?
Can't get closer than this tbh.No I thought Smith would edge it but just wanted to see how close it would be.