• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sreesanth gets life ban

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Sreesanth continuing a career-long tradition of making himself more valuable to the Indian Test side than Ishant Sharma by ensuring he's not eligible for selection.

Well done Sree; always putting the team first.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Sreesanth continuing a career-long tradition of making himself more valuable to the Indian Test side than Ishant Sharma by ensuring he's not eligible for selection.

Well done Sree; always putting the team first.
Yep, good from you :laugh:
Can you imagine what it must feel like for your hero to turn out a total and utter **** of the highest proportions? Oh right..
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Yay for that.

Hoping that he doesn't become a reality show celebrity. Depriving him of any attention will be good punishment.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sreesanth ‏@sreesanth36 40m
Plss have faith in me..Iam sure I will prove my innocence soon....I will get through this..I ve full faith ..God is great..
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
At least he'll be able to concentrate on his greatest talent now - I reckon his face is tailor made for a starring role in South Park
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
He's stopped being relevant since 2007. Face it, this bloke wasn't as talented or productive as some romantic writers say he was. He just got lucky every now and then, but that's all someone with limited ability and insufficient pace can manage. Plenty of better bowlers out there who can move the ball better, or bowl decently fast. No big loss.

What is questionable, however, is this mouse-squishing by the BCCI, while the snakes are still at play. Why can't the BCCI try to bust the gambling racket instead? They won't need to ruin more careers by banning players, which is counter-productive. Catch the scamming bookmakers and handlers, and that will clean up the system forever.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
He's stopped being relevant since 2007. Face it, this bloke wasn't as talented or productive as some romantic writers say he was. He just got lucky every now and then, but that's all someone with limited ability and insufficient pace can manage. Plenty of better bowlers out there who can move the ball better, or bowl decently fast. No big loss.

What is questionable, however, is this mouse-squishing by the BCCI, while the snakes are still at play. Why can't the BCCI try to bust the gambling racket instead? They won't need to ruin more careers by banning players, which is counter-productive. Catch the scamming bookmakers and handlers, and that will clean up the system forever.
Busting the gambling racket is a police, not a BCCI issue.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Busting the gambling racket is a police, not a BCCI issue.
This must be right. On the basis that it creates interest in the sport it must, surely, be in the BCCI's interest that there is gambling on cricket, so their interest is not in driving it further underground but in securing a clean system. If the Indian Police and government aren't, as they seem not to be, overly bothered with sorting it out, then why don't they just legalise it - in the way that governments do they can even make on it by licensing the bookies and trousering the fees - having a legalised and regulated system won't be an instant cure all, I'm not so naive as to think that, but it would certainly be more effective than closing down the odd dodgy bookie every now and again.

What adds to my confusion is why there is a ban in the first place - no doubt someone will correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that you can legally bet on the horses in India, in which case presumably there is presumably no taboo to gambling per se. The only thing I can think of is that the government doesn't much care when the victims of organised crime are ordinary citizens getting ripped off - what they don't want is the big players in the crime business turning their attention to other targets rather closer to home - similar to the reasons I'm convinced the infinitely sensible legalise controlled drugs debate never gets off the ground here.
 

Top