He's a different player to the one that played for NZ. Much more aggressive, and if he was younger a certainty for the England One day side imo. But he's 32 now and its just not going to happen no matter how much he scores at domestic level this year or next.Tim said:Bracewell sounded him out when he took over at the start of the year but Spearman told him he was committed to England now.
I still have my doubts whether he'd be any better in international matches, to be honest.
PY said:Can't see it happening to be honest. Trescothick, Vaughan and Strauss look pretty set to me.
Wouldn't mind him in ODI though after what he did to Yorkshire the other day.![]()
Yes, I do suggest that.Richard said:What were you suggesting I looked at instead?
And were you suggesting a low average can mean someone isn't crap?
You cant say that.Craig said:I think he has very little chance.
An average of 18 hardly makes him a good international batsman.
he isnt jsut saying he is british now, for the past 3 season he has been playing as an import as cd, as this gives him greater security on his county contract, as he is a local player. he has been living for britian for the past 3 years with his wife and kids, and now feels that is his home, and he is getting residency as im lead to beleive. the domestic game is resonably covered in nz, there is a lack of money and a lack of sponsors, fans at the domestic level. u gotta remeber this is a nation of 4 million people, most of who dont give two ****s about cricket unless we are winning.Will Scarlet said:If his mother is Welsh then he should qualify as a local player but still be eligible for NZ. Not just simply say, "I'm British now!". And now he is listed as an overseas player for CD. This seems bloody ridiculous.
I wanted him to play for NZ in the 2003 WC after seeing his turn-around in form in England, only to find out he was ineligible. Then he was badly needed in the test series against England due to injuries and form.
At the same time, NZC needs to learn from this and look after their players better. I believe that improved TV coverage of domestic cricket in NZ would significantly increase interest in the games and players, thus increasing revenues and player payments. I realise that TV coverage of domestic cricket is expensive but most people won't go and watch matches when they don't know the players.
How many opportunities did he get though?Mingster said:Yes and that average was at least 3 years ago? He has improved as a batsman from those days.
You obviously haven't seen England play an ODI match in awhile. Their 'top order' is barely that. Spearman probably isn't the answer, but you could do a lot worse, you could have Robert Key, Andrew McGrath, or Rikki Clarke in your team. Or perhaps even Michael Vaughan.tooextracool said:why in the world would england pick a NZ reject?