Quite possibly.Macka said:Spearman wouldn't be any worse than some of the players picked for England recently. He's probably not the answer, but would he do any worse than Vaughan?
I really don't know why there has been the talk there has been about it recently.Neil Pickup said:Spearman wouldn't make any International side better.
And England have no hang-ups whatsoever on picking non-English borns.. in fact, I couldn't tell you when we last picked an XI without one.
18 is only bordering, is it?Tim said:Waste of time...it would be a backward step by England to call up a 32 year old who's previous record in international record is bordering on the poor.
What about Bangladesh? Kenya? Zimbabwe?Neil Pickup said:Spearman wouldn't make any International side better.
yeah, sure. Write it on your sig.Barney Rubble said:Steds, can I join the Dave Mohammed fan club please?
So am I - I just prove it more often than you!Macka said:Well I'll have to admit that I'm completely hopeless, basketball is more my sport. So no I don't play for a club, just go down to the nets for a hit every now and then.
Ahmed, Cox, Hodge, Hussey, Goodwin are all overseas players.Barney Rubble said:If Spearman is eligible for England, wouldn't that mean that players like Mushtaq Ahmed, Jamie Cox, Brad Hodge, Mike Hussey, Andy Flower, and Murray Goodwin either are eligible or will be soon? Or am I misunderstanding the ruling?
I think you're missing the point. I wasn't comparing Vaughan to Spearman of a few years ago, I was comparing Vaughan with Spearman's current form.Richard said:Quite possibly.
18 was worse than 24 last I looked.