• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

South Africa team selection

Marius

International Debutant
This blows:


Isnt CSA sacrificing its busiest time by going to Australia over Dec / Jan as well. Talking about bending over :no:
'A dozen years ago Cricket South Africa insisted that the holiday season of Test cricket should be shared once every four years, that Australia should give up their crowds of 70,000 in Melbourne and 40,000 in Sydney to come and experience the ambience of 3,000 at Kingsmead on Boxing Day followed by a sold-out Newlands, as many as 20,000 - with a temporary stand erected. Cricket Australia declined. So, CSA said they wouldn’t be coming over. Cricket Australia had always paid a small but not negligible compensation fee to CSA for missing out on their own ‘prime-time’ season once every four years, and they will be doing so again at the end of this year. CSA need all the cash they can get.'


I don't think it's bending over, Boxing Day Test at MCG is one of the great events in world sport, think it's great we're going again over the Festive Season.
 

Heboric

International Regular
'A dozen years ago Cricket South Africa insisted that the holiday season of Test cricket should be shared once every four years, that Australia should give up their crowds of 70,000 in Melbourne and 40,000 in Sydney to come and experience the ambience of 3,000 at Kingsmead on Boxing Day followed by a sold-out Newlands, as many as 20,000 - with a temporary stand erected. Cricket Australia declined. So, CSA said they wouldn’t be coming over. Cricket Australia had always paid a small but not negligible compensation fee to CSA for missing out on their own ‘prime-time’ season once every four years, and they will be doing so again at the end of this year. CSA need all the cash they can get.'


I don't think it's bending over, Boxing Day Test at MCG is one of the great events in world sport, think it's great we're going again over the Festive Season.
Yes I know Australia get big crowds, heck a large crowd will go to watch two flies climbing up a wall with over excitable commentators who should work for the WWE. But its still a middle finger to the supporters here
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Its practical if not nice... and it would be more of a middle finger to supporters here if people bothered to show up for most Test match cricket (CT the exception really)... yes there is a circular logic in that good teams pull good crowds but its not like SA where filling up the stadiums when they had a great team.

Also we only talking once every 4 years, the other three years we will have a home Tests for the Christmas/New Year season...

Speaking of... (@GIMH happy new year!)
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Do you guys really think that is what is going on? I mean yes its not great that we going to lose a 1 every 4 year seasonal tests but what is the benefit? Much more monies for a struggling cricket association; we can only hope uses it properly. As opposed to being belligerent and hard headed about keeping the boxing day test that frequently ends up being played against much weaker opponents, and that does not attract crowds. Lets have some sensibility here. This has been in the works for awhile now.
 

Heboric

International Regular
Do you guys really think that is what is going on? I mean yes its not great that we going to lose a 1 every 4 year seasonal tests but what is the benefit? Much more monies for a struggling cricket association; we can only hope uses it properly. As opposed to being belligerent and hard headed about keeping the boxing day test that frequently ends up being played against much weaker opponents, and that does not attract crowds. Lets have some sensibility here. This has been in the works for awhile now.
So are we never going to play Australia in tests at home anymore ? I suppose whats egging me is that Australia bailed on us, now we have to "yes sir, no sir" to them
 

Stefan9

International Debutant
Who is the most important stakeholder the protea local fan or BCCI&CA?
Ever seen BCCI or CA do anything to the detriment of their own fans.
CSA does nothing to protect their own fans interests.
 

Stefan9

International Debutant
So are we never going to play Australia in tests at home anymore ? I suppose whats egging me is that Australia bailed on us, now we have to "yes sir, no sir" to them
Exactly whatever happened with the threat to deal with it at ICC level? Did CSA even launch the appeal...
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So are we never going to play Australia in tests at home anymore ? I suppose whats egging me is that Australia bailed on us, now we have to "yes sir, no sir" to them
We still will, we just don't play Aus at boxing day/christmas tests test time... that was always the fight we wanted them to come here but they would not take it away from there summer. And like it or not but they are in the position of monetary power. Now we can be belligerent with them and not play during that time and continue to have smaller series and play Aus outside the season, or we can accept the extra monies it provides and be in a better place financially.

Edit: And this was being talked about long before they pulled out of the recent test series. And I promise you that the ODI/T20 series CSA are much happier about even if us 'proper cricket' fans are not about losing the series. Personally I think we move on and take the win where we can.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Who is the most important stakeholder the protea local fan or BCCI&CA?
Ever seen BCCI or CA do anything to the detriment of their own fans.
CSA does nothing to protect their own fans interests.
If you think being insolvent is not a big negative for the fans and people playing cricket in this country I have other news for you...
 

Heboric

International Regular
We still will, we just don't play Aus at boxing day/christmas tests test time... that was always the fight we wanted them to come here but they would not take it away from there summer. And like it or not but they are in the position of monetary power. Now we can be belligerent with them and not play during that time and continue to have smaller series and play Aus outside the season, or we can accept the extra monies it provides and be in a better place financially.

Edit: And this was being talked about long before they pulled out of the recent test series. And I promise you that the ODI/T20 series CSA are much happier about even if us 'proper cricket' fans are not about losing the series. Personally I think we move on and take the win where we can.
Disagree, not being belligerent at all. Just wanted some fairness here
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If you think bowing down to CA & BCCI is the only way to stay solvent...
No its not the only way, but it does make the recovery from the dire financial situation they current find themselves in for easier and quicker, and thus also allows for the improvements we would all like to see in the system, happen earlier and in a better way. This is not the bridge to die on...
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
CSA turned the test matches into white ball matches because they get the same amount of money for less cricket and need to fit odi's in with an odi world cup in 2023, there's been no real time to play them recently with back to back t20 WC'S.
 

Heboric

International Regular
Other thing the coverage of the Oz tour will stink unless you have Supersport. Probably no radio coverage either (If playing at home you could get on SABC tv). All you would have is reading shitty Firdose Moonda articles :sick:
 

Dendarii

International Debutant
A loss for the women to Ireland. We weren't at full strength, with Van Niekerk, Kapp, and Lee injured, Du Preez not in the squad (maybe because she won't be playing in the ODIs), and Khaka for some reason not picked to play. Even so you would have expected us to win.

But even though losses like this can happen, especially due to T20s being less predictable, I'm a little worried about our depth. Our first choice team is a great one, but those who come into the side whenever someone's missing do seem to struggle. I know it can be difficult to put in good performances when you're in and out of the side, but that's out of a player's control and you do have to take the opportunities you're given, with some of them having been given quite a few.

De Klerk and Sekhukhune do show promise, but at the moment they're definitely a significant step down from Ismail, Kapp, and Khaka. As for the batting, I'm just not convinced by Goodall, Brits, or Bosch.

I don't think it's necessarily a problem right now, but my worry is that we're seeing a similar situation as the one we saw with the men, where we had a team with some of the best players we've ever produced and then a string of retirements in a relatively short space of time left us floundering.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
A loss for the women to Ireland. We weren't at full strength, with Van Niekerk, Kapp, and Lee injured, Du Preez not in the squad (maybe because she won't be playing in the ODIs), and Khaka for some reason not picked to play. Even so you would have expected us to win.

But even though losses like this can happen, especially due to T20s being less predictable, I'm a little worried about our depth. Our first choice team is a great one, but those who come into the side whenever someone's missing do seem to struggle. I know it can be difficult to put in good performances when you're in and out of the side, but that's out of a player's control and you do have to take the opportunities you're given, with some of them having been given quite a few.

De Klerk and Sekhukhune do show promise, but at the moment they're definitely a significant step down from Ismail, Kapp, and Khaka. As for the batting, I'm just not convinced by Goodall, Brits, or Bosch.

I don't think it's necessarily a problem right now, but my worry is that we're seeing a similar situation as the one we saw with the men, where we had a team with some of the best players we've ever produced and then a string of retirements in a relatively short space of time left us floundering.
undefeated and in style since this post, good job.

would y'all like a Europe tour thread?
 

Top