Not the first time you've said this about me Richard. Its actually quite offensive. Everytime I disagree with you, you make it out to be a petty grudge. Have you ever thought, I might disagree, because you talk so much.......
It's not true at all. As with The Pitt Affair it's easy to see, with hindsight, why I could have been appearing to say something I wasn't. Sadly, as I know from that issue, it takes quite something to convince otherwise those who have attained the ideas that they have.
Yes.
No, not every time you disagree with me. Just every time you make an attempt to say something that will have a negative effect on the way I am perceived on the forum. And yes, it does come across as being nothing but a petty grudge and opportunism to jump on any anti-Dickinson bandwagon going. And no, I'm not the only one that thinks that about you and one or two others.
EXD'd be proud of you, carrying the fight like that.
I'll say it again, then - I really did think you knew me better than that. I'm disappointed, very much so.
I don't know how well I know you. I do consider you a very nice bloke though. I do think you have some flaws in your posting but you have improved tremendously from the past in this aspect. That is not a major thing though. In all, I do hold you in good regard.
Right, well its hard to argue with someone, who keeps on talking about mythical "others", and refuses to argue points, only personal twaddle.
Haha. It's hard to argue with someone who suggests that someone else "refuses to argue points, only personal twaddle". And no, said others aren't mythical. How many people do you talk to off-forum, I wonder?
I made no such suggestion.Oh, yeah, me and Scaly are very close, I'm glad you noticed
Not using sarcasm, or putting in smileys, is easier said than done. I'll give it a try, mind, as incidents like this are categorically not savoury. Thing is, though, I can't win - if I never do such things it's everything we've had in the past and the whole "you don't get humour" nonsense.
I don't talk to anyone off forum Richard, it's a deliberate policy, because I don't want to get involved in pointless in-fighting. Which you clearly realise, and keep on waffling on, about how wildly popular you are on messenger. I have no interest in what others say about me off-forum, I go totally on what I see on-forum. Which surely is the entire point of posting on forums. Name names, or shut up about it.
Yep. We do agree on some thing. Haven't agreed on any thing in the past few days.
Ahh, the best post of the thread, imho
No, I don't "keep waffling on about how popular I am on Messenger". Because in case you don't realise it, the people on the Messenger are actually the same people as those who post on the forum. Some stuff doesn't get said on the forum that gets said on MSN - it's called forum rules, there are some things that are against protocol. I have no wish to incriminate myself by saying stuff on the forum that I know will get me into trouble. So if I wish to talk about something which is not appropriate to be saying on the forum, I use other methods.
No, that's actually a completely different issue.
