Probably yes. Was looking good, until that crazy shot though.
The odd thing is that it's surely almost certainly the last time he'll bat in a Test in Australia. He's never made any claim that he wants to go beyond 2009 over here. So you'd imagine he'd have some sort of goodbye. But not neccessarily a retirement goodbye.Yeah, was interesting to see whether he raised the bat as he was coming off. Thought that would be the biggest indication, as the crowd were intimating that they thought it would be the last time that they'd see him bat.
Physical talents as in running between the wickets, or reactions or just in terms of his intimidating batting ability, whatever it is i don't think there is any problem with that, he is striking the ball as well as i have seen him, but is just failing to convert those 20's and 30's into hundreds.The only case for him being dropped is if it's obvious his physical talents have taken a decline. Some argue they have; some argue they haven't. If they have, he has to go. If they haven't, there's currently no case for him to do so. It's as simple as that, really.
Surely Rich you hope he continues so he drops his average down below 50..The only case for him being dropped is if it's obvious his physical talents have taken a decline. Some argue they have; some argue they haven't. If they have, he has to go. If they haven't, there's currently no case for him to do so. It's as simple as that, really.
Physical talents in terms of his eyesight, hand-eye coordination etc. The most basic basics of batting, in short. Those which no batsman can hope to get by without.Physical talents as in running between the wickets, or reactions or just in terms of his intimidating batting ability, whatever it is i don't think there is any problem with that, he is striking the ball as well as i have seen him, but is just failing to convert those 20's and 30's into hundreds.
Seemed to me like he was trying to do that in the first-innings at The SCG. Didn't work this time. And obviously playing with caution on a pitch like this has become by the Aus second-innings was never going to work for all that long, so he had a swing.I think there is case for him to play a cautious knock like the one he played at the Oval in the 5th Ashes test in 2005 and get some runs under his belt, before he goes back playing like his aggressive dominant self.
I hope he continues, certainly, and I hope he fails all the way through the SA tour and the England one. Not specifically below 50 BTW, his career average against Test-standard teams is already below that. Though I would like his post-2001/02 average to drop below 50 as well if poss. But I just want it all to go as low as possible, because then those who insist that career average is all that matters will thus judge him accordingly. Won't affect how I judge him, I've already long since made-up my mind there, but it might well do for others who don't take sufficient note of how an average is broken down.Surely Rich you hope he continues so he drops his average down below 50..
Yea, but it was an ugly shot.
Thought Hayden summed up the conditions reasonably well. Morkel was doing a good job of hitting the crack and providing quite a handful. Hayden took the impetus away from him with some positive intent - something that the lead and pitch conditions admittedly allowed him to undertake.
Got a ball that stayed low and came back in, and his swing altered because of it, making it look uglier than it really was.
But it would have been imperious if it went for four. It was shots such as the one which led to his demise which got him into double figures.Yea, but it was an ugly shot.
Look as A MASSIVE but unbiased Hayden supporter i probably don't want him to be dropped/retire ya digg. But i am tired arguing his case, so whatever happens let it be..
Hope he goes on to the Ashes and bats so well he gets 10000 test runs...I hope he continues, certainly, and I hope he fails all the way through the SA tour and the England one. Not specifically below 50 BTW, his career average against Test-standard teams is already below that. Though I would like his post-2001/02 average to drop below 50 as well if poss. But I just want it all to go as low as possible, because then those who insist that career average is all that matters will thus judge him accordingly. Won't affect how I judge him, I've already long since made-up my mind there, but it might well do for others who don't take sufficient note of how an average is broken down.
In that post you just quoted I'm simply talking from the POV of someone who wants Australia to do as well as possible.