steds
Hall of Fame Member
He's no Monty Panesar, though.I think more batsmen should retire in their 20s when they have more centuries than anyone else to ever play for their country
He's no Monty Panesar, though.I think more batsmen should retire in their 20s when they have more centuries than anyone else to ever play for their country
Yeah but would you want Bairstow and/ or Ballance to come in for Perth?Root and Prior can **** off first closely followed by KP, and i hate saying that about KP.
Imagine if anyone had suggested 6 months ago that Prior should be dropped, you would think they were delusional, staggering drop off in form, he should be ****ed off sharpish now though but then its ****ing Bairstow.
Its one of those scenarios of what would you prefer isnt it, a punch in the face or a boot in the bollocks with those 2.
Nope. Not unless he resigns he won't.Being serious though Cook may lose the captaincy if we lose 5-0.
That record is rather meaningless considering there are so many players from countries with less money/infrastructure with 30+ centuries. If anything it makes England's batsman look like habitual under-performers when an accumulator like Cook has 23 centuries before he's 29 rather than making Cook look very good.I think more batsmen should retire in their 20s when they have more centuries than anyone else to ever play for their country
It's just too rigid. They got to number one through absolute, machine-like devotion to a single game-plan, but that has meant that they have no flexibility at all. Any time they're significantly exposed (Ajmal, Harris) or they meet something which you can't really contain using conventional methods (Johnson, Amla, Clarke) they seem exceptionally brittle.As a batsman, he's have a rough period. Exposed by the fact that bar Bell the rest of them are as well.
As a captain however he needs a change of approach. Nothing to do with this series as we are being blown away. But ever since Strauss retired there has been an increasing timid and gutless side to the way England are playing cricket. The run rate slowing to a crawl. The lack of killer instinct. These are things the captain should be influencing. He's obviously incredibly conservative and it's worked up until now. IMO he needs to start changing the attitudes in the dressing room.
Still we'll likely hammer India at home next summer and carry on as normal.
He's just having a very well known technical flaw ruthlessly exposed by an excellent bowling attack. That's really the sum total of it.
I hope not. It's been said before, but his captaincy should improve, and it hasn't been anywhere near a contributing factor to this debacle.Being serious though Cook may lose the captaincy if we lose 5-0.
I'm not saying he should lose the job but he may as the press will start a witchhunt soon enough.I hope not. It's been said before, but his captaincy should improve, and it hasn't been anywhere near a contributing factor to this debacle.
The question is whether he can go on to be our version of Allan Border, overseeing the introduction of a hungrier new generation to replace the big names who are content to live off past glories for a a few more pay-cheques. I don't think there's a massive well of talent in the CC, but we need someone experienced to run things whilst the kids find their feet.
Assuming massive defeats here and in Perth, the rebuilding starts in Melbourne.