its shoaib akthar and mohammed asif rite.... as is Akhtar
ya here is the link from cricinfo.com.its shoaib akthar and mohammed asif rite
Ya think?i bet they faild the test and to cover it up they made this excuase.
Shabbir is unfit, so he couldn't made it.i bet they faild the test and to cover it up they made this excuase.
why didn't they pick shabbir instead of sami any ways ?
u r funny man. in ur last post u forgot to include rana and anjum in that list. they are both worse than kuneria and sami.Shabbir is unfit, so he couldn't made it.
Sami was included on a personal request of Indian star Sehwaq, the best chance of Sehwag of finding his form is by facing the Pakistani legend Sami.
They are most certainly not worse than Sami... and I don't think Anjum is worse than Kaneria either...u r funny man. in ur last post u forgot to include rana and anjum in that list. they are both worse than kuneria and sami.
If that is the case then we will see in Wc 2007 the worst ever bowling attack in action, a complete laughing stock, as whoever is worse then Kaneria and Sami got to be a laughing stock.u r funny man. in ur last post u forgot to include rana and anjum in that list. they are both worse than kuneria and sami.
Anything wrong with bowling line and length?.I was quite impressed with him in the one day game he had aaginst SA.Regulary hitting 140kph and was beating the bat often but then Kallis got after him....Anjum is a medicre pacer who just try to dry up the runs by sticking to steady line and length.
Bits and pieces? Grouping Mahmood and Arafat with Hafeez and Malik there is farcical. At the very least Mahmood and Arafat are bowlers who can bat.Rest of the bowling will depend on bits and pieces players like Malik,Azhar ,Hafeez and Arafat who can both bat and bowl a little bit.Afridi though is a useful spinner in ODI.