Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Well - Bermuda and Canada, yes.He's shown plenty of times in domestic cricket he can do it, and a lot of that is of a higher quality than some international sides.
Well - Bermuda and Canada, yes.He's shown plenty of times in domestic cricket he can do it, and a lot of that is of a higher quality than some international sides.
It's hardly unrealistic assumptions, though. Most bowlers lose a good 7 or 8 mph as the ball travels through the air.So you beleive that Thompson was the fastest ever, and fairly comfortably despite having no real evidence to back you up other than assumptions. Cool.
I was talking to you, MP and PF.If you're talking to me there, I meant comparitively to what we usually see people clocked at.
I like your thinkin'!Monty was being clocked quicker, but solely because he was bowling a hell of a lot flatter and quicker than in the tests.
Actually, that is evidence. It's an obvious fact of physics that the ball loses speed after being released from the hand. So naturally, if you measure a bowler's speed when they release the ball (as speed guns do today) it will be significantly quicker than if you measure the average speed over the length of the pitch. Obviously it's difficult to calculate exactly what that difference would be (though not impossible), but there will be one.So you beleive that Thompson was the fastest ever, and fairly comfortably despite having no real evidence to back you up other than assumptions. Cool.
And please get them to bowl to Bradman, McCabe, Ponting, Hobbs, Hammond, Richards, Sobers, Lara, Gavaskar, Sachin, Dravid, Barry Richards and Graeme Pollock.One of the first things I'm going to do in the next world is to get God to line me up Lockwood, Kortwright, Jones, Cotter, Larwood, Tyson, Hall, Lillee, Thommo, Holding, Marshall, Waqar, Lee, Shoaib and any others I've missed there, all at their absolute peak, and find out who was quickest.