Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
No, as I've said before - aside from that crazy Mumbai second-innings, Dhoni seems to me to tend to play quite remarkably responsibly.Pothas said:Dhoni?
No, as I've said before - aside from that crazy Mumbai second-innings, Dhoni seems to me to tend to play quite remarkably responsibly.Pothas said:Dhoni?
So "fortunately we have a lot of lot of them (good Indian posters) on here" actually means that I'm glad we have the odd terrace element then does it?Richard said:You were talking about them?
You seemed to me to be responding to the (sarcastic) post by dontcloseyoureyes where he said "gotta love a good Indian", ie "isn't it stupid having all these biased Indians".
Clearly there was no reference to Dasa, hbh, Jono, SJS, adharcric, etc.
What a baby if that is the case.What-A-Player said:Its not about this age, it probably has something to do with being dropped in the last game
Random testing?vic_orthdox said:Those scans and stuff I think in the end just give a range of ages you'd be. A few guys from each side at the U/19 WC had to take them, and the results came back saying "You are between 17 and 21 years old" and stuff like that.
That's the way he plays, get used to it.Richard said:Err, so do Adam Gilchrist, Sanath Jayasuriya, Sourav Ganguly, Marcus Trescothick and about a million others at the current time. Almost all batsmen at the current time are strokeplayers.
But few if any play as many utterly stupid strokes as Afridi. About the only one who comes close is Mohammad Ashraful.
TT Boy said:"Woolmer to discuss 'retirement' with Afridi"
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/india/content/story/244553.html
Almost invariably when I reply to a joke-comment in apparent seriousness I'm not actually being so.marc71178 said:So "fortunately we have a lot of lot of them (good Indian posters) on here" actually means that I'm glad we have the odd terrace element then does it?
Just because I was replying to a sarcastic message doesn't mean that I was using sarcasm - as shown by the number of times you respond to a joke comment in complete seriousness - I was merely emphasising that it's a shame that we have the idiots who give the very readable posters a bad name.
I'm used to it.open365 said:That's the way he plays, get used to it.
Well... or it could save us from facing a walking wicket.SpeedKing said:Tha is honestly one of the best ieces of good news i have had this year. Don't like seeing opposition players injured, but when they opt out, its fine by me. Saves us alot of heartache this summer
His some walking wicket, career average high 30s, two tons in his last five test matches.Richard said:Well... or it could save us from facing a walking wicket.
Took Hoggard to cleaners, brutal stuff.Jono said:He smacked 92 against two of those bowlers only a few months ago!!!
Being dropped at least twice.Jono said:He smacked 92 from 85 balls against two of those bowlers only a few months ago!!!
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/ENG_IN_PAK/SCORECARDS/ENG_PAK_T2_20-24NOV2005.html
For sure the pitch was pretty good to bat on but let's be sensible Richard, Afridi is not a walking wicket. You do not have an average 38 if you are a walking wicket, his not Chris Martin.Richard said:Being dropped at least twice.
I might remind you, the conditions were not comparable.
As I've said about Afridi before - usually it takes just 2 or 3 bad innings (sometimes even less) for him to be dropped. This means that, when he goes into a (frequent) bad trott, it doesn't adversely affect his average.TT Boy said:For sure the pitch was pretty good to bat on but let's be sensible Richard, Afridi is not a walking wicket. You do not have an average 38 if you are a walking wicket, his not Chris Martin.