Matt79
Hall of Fame Member
So what if Watson doesn't bat, does that void the conditions?
Exactly.Yeah, that'd be part of the "not out" condition. If he doesn't bat then won't get out.
So what if Watson doesn't bat, does that void the conditions?
Exactly.Yeah, that'd be part of the "not out" condition. If he doesn't bat then won't get out.
By your reckoning then England should have been extremely heavy favourites against Australia in this WC...http://nz.cricinfo.com/db/STATS/BY_OPPONENT/NZ-SL/ODI/NZ-SL_ODI_SERIES_SUMMARY.html
So the betting agencies ignore this then ...
2006/07 West Indies (World Cup) SL 2 NZ 0 (prior to this morning 1 - 0)
2006/07 In New Zealand SL 2 NZ 2 No result 1
2006/07 In India (neutral Venue) SL 1 NZ 0
2005/06 In NZ SL 1 NZ 3
Being part of the current England side?First time I've been accused of being a South African! That's another one I can add to my profile. For the record, I'm the decendant of a man who played in Australia's first test match - but you're right, it doesn't get much more South African than that.
Well played.Being part of the current England side?
Aus batsmen in the final overs (41-50) in the Super Eights
Batsmen Runs Balls faced Dismissals Average Strike rate
Shane Watson 98 58 0 - 168.97
Matthew Hayden 53 27 1 53 196.30
Andrew Symonds 35 38 1 35 92.11
Michael Hussey 25 31 1 25.00 80.65
Good for the nerves, tbh.South Africa win the toss and are going to bat first. Good for the game IMO>
Haha, don't make me post the pic.So is it duck soup or deer hunting tonight?![]()
With that much swing on offer, Bracken and McGrath should be the obvious choices.No Tait with the new ball today why??